My Message close
GAME JOBS
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
May 25, 2013
 
Beer and Diversity
 
Selling Games
 
Want To Help Stop Youth Cyberbullying? Let Your Kids Raid More.
 
Tenets of Videodreams, Part 1: Exploration [2]
 
We're Indie, we like Microsoft. Too Controversial? [38]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
May 25, 2013
 
Treyarch / Activision
Technical Animator
 
Treyarch / Activision
Game Systems Designer
 
Infinity Ward / Activision
Senior Tools Engineer
 
Airtight Games
Environment Artist
 
App Minis LLC
Senior Unity Game Programmer
 
Gameloft
Game Designer
spacer
Latest Press Releases
spacer View All     RSS spacer
 
May 25, 2013
 
12 Million Downloads
after 1 Year in the
AppStore
 
Global Games Market Grows
6% to $70.4bn in 2013
 
Sharpen Your Battle Axes
and Prepare to
Pillage!...
 
Active Soccer - Indiegogo
campaign
 
Fashion Party Dress Up
Press Release
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief:
Kris Graft
Blog Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Mike Rose, Kris Ligman
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
Education:
Gillian Crowley
 
Contact Gamasutra
 
Report a Problem
 
Submit News
 
Comment Guidelines
Sponsor

  Making asynchronous gameplay work for more than two players Exclusive
Making asynchronous gameplay work for more than two players
 

October 18, 2012   |   By Staff

Comments 3 comments

More: Social/Online, Indie, Design, Exclusive





Inspired to create an asynchronous multiplayer RPG called Conclave, indie developer Derek Bruneau needed to find a way to bring more than two players into the game to make it a truly satisfying multiplayer experience, yet still allow players to play when they had the free time.

"Initially the game assigned a turn order to players," writes Bruneau. This, however, didn't work out. "While turn order is a tradition in tabletop RPGs... it quickly became apparent that it could lead to frustration" as players had to wait for multiple people to finish their turns before getting their next one -- imagine waiting for a Words With Friends turn times three.

"To address this issue we simply removed the concept of turn order from the game. Players can still take only one turn per round, but they can take them in whichever order they prefer," Bruneau writes, in his extensive new feature on the decisions his team made about the feature.

This has the benefit of reduced wait times for players, but also further streamlines play by allowing "a player that acts last in one round has the option to immediately take the first action in the next round," writes Bruneau.

"In a tight spot, players can act in whichever order gives them the greatest tactical benefit," he also writes. "With no turn order, you can ask your ally to use the ability and then follow up with your (now more effective) attack."

This has a nasty flipside, though: "two players might submit their turns at nearly the same time, rendering the later player's action suboptimal or invalid."

Even with the potential for problems like this, and the additional work they require to be resolved, "the benefits of streamlined play and additional tactical options are worth it," Bruneau writes.

This all comes part of a larger feature article on the process of developing Conclave's asynchronous multiplayer, which is live now on Gamasutra.
 
 
Top Stories

image
Blog: We're indie, we like Microsoft. So what?
image
Xbox One preowned rumors batter GameStop shares
image
Blog: Theme and craft, games and art
image
Xbox One: A flawed plan, well-executed


   
 
Comments

Arnaud Clermonté
profile image
What if 2 players are in a rock-paper-scissors situation and both wait for the other to move first?

Frank Gilson
profile image
You poke them with pins or give them little electric shocks...

John Trauger
profile image
In the dinosaurian days of pre-internet BBS games, this is exactly how things were handled.

In Trade Wars, forex, each 24-hour day was a turn. you could act any time you felt like it. People did take two back to back turns, one right before midnight one after to assault an especially problematic fortification.

Few BBSes had more than one phone line so by definition all the other players were locked out while the one player hogged access and executed his attacks.


none
 
Comment:
 




 
UBM Tech