Richard Lemarchand | Visiting Associate Professor, Interactive Media Division, University of Southern California introduces the session.
"Welcome to the GDC Microtalks! Each speaker gets 20 slides, each of which gets displayed for exactly 16 seconds. Our goal today is simply to provide bite-size morsels of progressive, philosophical, future-looking game design inspiration for your brilliant, hungry minds! This is an interesting time for the game industry – it’s a time of great change, in terms of the way we make and distribute games, the way that we fund the games that we make, and in terms of the culture around games and the people who play them. For a lot of people, it’s a scary time. But anyone with a background in agile development will be used to seeing change as an opportunity rather than a crisis. By approaching the challenges we face with rationality and an openness to criticism and to new ideas, we can seize a chance to forge positive change in this industry that we love. It’s now up to us, the people who make and evangelize games, to live up to (the) faith that’s been placed in us, to be thoughtful and to use integrity in our work, and to continue to usher games into the mainstream of our cultural and artistic discourse, where they belong."
Leigh Alexander | Editor at Large, Gamasutra on video gaming's image crisis:
"I feel for the first time grown-ups are listening when I talk about the work that I do. Commercial games are still treating their audiences like kids. Many appear focused solely on what teen boys like. There is homogeneity and arrested development in AAA game development. We need to do more. We know audience is getting bigger and yet the market is constrained. Video games have a serious image crisis. Marketing can sell crap but it's failing to sell joy. We need a fresh perspective. If you work in marketing and you just want to make numbers, please work in another industry. It'll be better for everyone."
Tom Bissell | Writer, Freelance on what it means to be a writer on a video game:
"Big budget game development is not a writer’s medium. The writer doesn’t steer the story; the player steers story. The writer contextualizes story. People believe that game and story are two different things. But my experience taught me story and game are the same thing. Story has to be what the game does. Writer has to provide orientation, mood and to provide the context for a story."
Kim Swift | Project Lead/Game Designer, Airtight Games on 'how to not be a douche-y boss':
"Always give people credit for their work and ideas. Having credit taken from your work sucks. Take responsibility when things go wrong and give credit when things go well. Express opinion, but always ensure your criticism is constructive. Before delivering your critique, find something you like first, comment on it and then move on to critical comments. Don’t underestimate the power of empathy. Being empathetic makes you more approachable as a boss."
George Fan | Game Designer, Independent on how to choose the right theme for your game.
"Does your theme support your game mechanics? This is a crucial question for a game-maker Always choose a world that fits as snugly with your game mechanics as possible. Constantly look to have one influencing the other. If mechanics and theme are tightly knit you will have a much stronger experience. Also ask whether your theme has both familiarity and novelty. The familiar is what makes theme easy to relate to; novelty is what makes it interesting.
Dr Carla Fisher | Founder & President, No Crusts Interactive on the gamer’s guide to parenting:
"Kids are a multi-genre game in extensive need of QA. Guiding children’ behavior is a significant task. To change behaviors systems must motivate - we know this from game design. Design a reward to inspire a shift in behaviors."
Ben Cerveny | Founder & President, Bloom on game design in the city:
"The city is already out biggest game. The city is the most complex game we have: multiple people using multiple systems to collaboratively build. The city provides new immersive contexts for expression. Let’s build the tools to play the city together. As a new medium we’re not going to a new device: we are stepping outside of the device. Let's discover the games that can occur there.”
Mare Sheppard | President, Metanet Software Inc. on the fear of being a one-hit wonder
Part of our studio never felt we should move on till we’ve finished our first successful project, n. Every time we thought about returning to n it felt like a step backwards. Over the years we worked on a bunch of new games but they never felt as good as n. Idea after idea had problems and we started to believe that maybe n was the only thing we could ever do. Caught in a horrible struggle of needing to finish n or to move on. We started to see that everyone is stressed and has problems, even if they’re not talking about them. Struggles don’t mean that we are stupid or broken. It would help all of us if we could talk about the psychological pitfalls of making games as much as we do the technical ones."
Anna Anthropy | Primary Antagonist, Auntie Pixelante on diversity on panels at tech conferences:
"Men should boycott panels that don’t feature women on them. If you're a man and you're being asked to speak on a panel where no women have been asked then refuse vocally and explain your reason for it. The industry as a whole has a problem with women. Maybe you'd like a game industry for grown-ups. If so, women need to be included in that discussion, and to even lead that discussion. A more diverse cast gives a more diverse set of thoughts."
Manveer Heir | Senior Gameplay Designer, BioWare Montreal on game-creators making themselves vulnerable through their work:
"Throughout the game Papo & Yo (a game about its creator's experiences living with an alcoholic father) I sobbed from the gravity of emotion of the game. The game didn’t make me cry through a timed narrative dynamic. I cried because it showed me the power of letting go, specifically of the anger I held towards my younger brother. It reminded of the need to let go of anger, to forgive and look towards the future lest I become a monster. This wouldn’t happen if the creator hadn’t showcased his vulnerability. I long for more games that move players to reflect in ways that they do not normally. I hope more of you - no matter what games you make - will consider putting this kind of content in your game."
"Men should boycott panels that don’t feature women on them. If you're a man and you're being asked to speak on a panel where no women have been asked then refuse vocally and explain your reason for it. The industry as a whole has a problem with women. Maybe you'd like a game industry for grown-ups. If so, women need to be included in that discussion, and to even lead that discussion. A more diverse cast gives a more diverse set of thoughts."
Funny for a moment I though the most important thing in a game industry panel would be games, business around games and so on. I guess the joke is on me.
I'm down with it. Inclusion of women in games. I mean how can you not be? Games are about humans despite what that it guy will tell you and women (contraty to what you'd read on the internet) are just as human as any,
But is this approach the best one? To make every single speak a political one? Take a look at this example:
On the game I'm about to talk in this year SBGames, I'm the public face and speaker for it. Yet the game was made by 3 people: Two women and me, a guy.
They choose me to be the speaker because they feel I'm good at handling a crowd. When I speak, it's about a game with more women touches than otherwise. I'm sure this isn't the common place for all talks, but the point is: Shouldn't we focus on games on said speaks, whoever is saying?
Because the game deals with important and contemporary issues that deal with Native Brazillians and their story, their struggle, on the founding of this very country.
Would I benefit if I refused to speak if in the panel I'll take part has no women to speak?
I feel if I choose to be political when I have things to share with fellow game makers, about serious stuff, about pushing the game concept foward, I'd be failing with fellow game makers by sitting on what I learn without pushing it to the others. And I'd be failling the two women who picked me to represent our game, for their stories and hard work would consist of me refusing to talk if I don't act sexist and check if there is a gender missing from the talks.
However I'm not afraid.
Here in Brazil we have a healthy supply of women working on the industry and I've seen several talks and panels with women in them. So I'd probably sit next to one on our discussions.
I want to make it clear though, that we must not lose focus as well hope, and to not make the mistake of making this about politics, for when we do this we remove the most important aspects of this very issue, the human side of it.
By refusing to talk on your own findings because there isn't a women in the talk, you are commiting a disservice to both women and men.
I think you are focusing too much on a small call to action from a (slightly) broader talk.
The key to Anna's talk was "A more diverse cast gives a more diverse set of thoughts," but I'd say the other half of the talk was "If you want to change things, you need to take some sort of action."
So, if you feel a games industry dominated by one gender isn't optimal, then figure out some sort of action that will encourage change. Refusing to take part in a panel if the organizers only selected men is a pretty easy action to take.
The culture of an industry contributes to its products as much as the business and design. It's not some separate silly political issue.
"But is this approach the best one? To make every single speak a political one?"
One of the best points of discussion regarding this issue I heard during GDC was that you don't choose to be political or not political. Everything is political. Thus when you make the choice to not be political, you're choosing to side with the default political stance in a given situation.
I wish I could remember who said it, GDC's kind of a blur*. But I think it's a good way to see that choosing to not make a decision is still making a decision.
I don't mean this as a contradiction to anything you've said, more as something to think about.
* Ed: It was Mitu Khandaker - remembered via this: http://kotaku.com/and-then-the-video-game-industry-woke-up-464888949 . Her rant was really, really good.
Funny for a moment I though the most important thing in a game industry panel would be games, business around games and so on. I guess the joke is on me.
I'm down with it. Inclusion of women in games. I mean how can you not be? Games are about humans despite what that it guy will tell you and women (contraty to what you'd read on the internet) are just as human as any,
But is this approach the best one? To make every single speak a political one? Take a look at this example:
On the game I'm about to talk in this year SBGames, I'm the public face and speaker for it. Yet the game was made by 3 people: Two women and me, a guy.
They choose me to be the speaker because they feel I'm good at handling a crowd. When I speak, it's about a game with more women touches than otherwise. I'm sure this isn't the common place for all talks, but the point is: Shouldn't we focus on games on said speaks, whoever is saying?
Because the game deals with important and contemporary issues that deal with Native Brazillians and their story, their struggle, on the founding of this very country.
Would I benefit if I refused to speak if in the panel I'll take part has no women to speak?
I feel if I choose to be political when I have things to share with fellow game makers, about serious stuff, about pushing the game concept foward, I'd be failing with fellow game makers by sitting on what I learn without pushing it to the others. And I'd be failling the two women who picked me to represent our game, for their stories and hard work would consist of me refusing to talk if I don't act sexist and check if there is a gender missing from the talks.
However I'm not afraid.
Here in Brazil we have a healthy supply of women working on the industry and I've seen several talks and panels with women in them. So I'd probably sit next to one on our discussions.
I want to make it clear though, that we must not lose focus as well hope, and to not make the mistake of making this about politics, for when we do this we remove the most important aspects of this very issue, the human side of it.
By refusing to talk on your own findings because there isn't a women in the talk, you are commiting a disservice to both women and men.
It's about addition, not subtraction.
The key to Anna's talk was "A more diverse cast gives a more diverse set of thoughts," but I'd say the other half of the talk was "If you want to change things, you need to take some sort of action."
So, if you feel a games industry dominated by one gender isn't optimal, then figure out some sort of action that will encourage change. Refusing to take part in a panel if the organizers only selected men is a pretty easy action to take.
The culture of an industry contributes to its products as much as the business and design. It's not some separate silly political issue.
One of the best points of discussion regarding this issue I heard during GDC was that you don't choose to be political or not political. Everything is political. Thus when you make the choice to not be political, you're choosing to side with the default political stance in a given situation.
I wish I could remember who said it, GDC's kind of a blur*. But I think it's a good way to see that choosing to not make a decision is still making a decision.
I don't mean this as a contradiction to anything you've said, more as something to think about.
* Ed: It was Mitu Khandaker - remembered via this: http://kotaku.com/and-then-the-video-game-industry-woke-up-464888949 . Her rant was really, really good.