Our Properties: Gamasutra GameCareerGuide IndieGames Indie Royale GDC IGF Game Developer Magazine GAO
My Message close
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
Analyst questions validity of unusual January NPD results [1]
 
DICE 2012: Blizzard's Pearce on World Of Warcraft's launch hangover
 
DICE 2012: Insomniac's Price on Quality Of Life, ditching the 'Loser' badge
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
arrow Principles of an Indie Game Bottom Feeder [14]
 
arrow Postmortem: CyberConnect 2's Solatorobo: Red the Hunter [1]
 
arrow Jerked Around by the Magic Circle - Clearing the Air Ten Years Later [37]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
What the current RPG can learn from Diablo 1
 
Double Fine's Kickstarter Windfall: Will Patronage Supplant Traditional Game Publishing? [4]
 
The Principles of Game Monetization
 
Did DoubleFine Just break the publishing model for good? [6]
 
The Devil Is in the Details of Action RPGs - Part One: The Logistics of Loot [4]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
Kabam
Lead Software Engineer - Flash
 
Kabam
Lead Software Engineer-Ruby
 
Kabam
Software Engineer - PHP - Mobile
 
NetherRealm Studios
Senior Software Engineer, Network - WB Games/NetherRealm Studios - 126710BR
 
Warner Bros Games
Staff Software Engineer, Game Systems - WB Games/Monolith Productions - 125467
 
TimeGate Studios
Recruitment Coordinator
spacer
Latest Press Releases
spacer View All     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
Web Fiesta Revolutionizes
Browser Gaming with
Full...
 
The greatest videogame
endings of all time...
 
TRION WORLDS AND CHINESE
ONLINE GIANT SHANDA
GAMES...
 
Dragons vs. Unicorns Goes
Solo
 
Spidermann named our game
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief/News Director:
Kris Graft
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Frank Cifaldi, Tom Curtis, Mike Rose, Eric Caoili, Kris Graft
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
 
Comment Guidelines
Sponsor
News

  Disney Buys Marvel In $4 Billion Deal
by Leigh Alexander [PC, Console/PC]
32 comments
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
August 31, 2009
 
Disney Buys Marvel In $4 Billion Deal

The Walt Disney Company has acquired comic book and movie producer Marvel Entertainment for $4 billion, bringing some 5,000 iconic characters under the Mouse's purview.

Marvel continues to produce comic books and license its characters for multimedia uses. In recent years, it has expanded to funding and producing its own feature films like Iron Man, as opposed to licensing its own characters to third parties for those.

The acquisition is likely to have wide-ranging implications for the license-reliant video game industry, with major Marvel-licensing publishers including Sega and Activision, and Gazillion's upcoming Marvel Universe MMO.

Disney CEO Robert Iger commented: "This transaction combines Marvel's strong global brand and world-renowned library of characters including Iron Man, Spider-Man, X-Men, Captain America, Fantastic Four and Thor with Disney's creative skills, unparalleled global portfolio of entertainment properties, and a business structure that maximizes the value of creative properties across multiple platforms and territories."

Marvel says it stands to benefit from Disney's ability to spread IP across multiple arenas. "This is an unparalleled opportunity for Marvel to build upon its vibrant brand and character properties by accessing Disney's tremendous global organization and infrastructure around the world," says CEO Ike Perlmutter.

The deal is still subject to regulatory approval before it's finalized, although both companies are in agreement. Perlmutter will stay on board with Marvel to assist in the integration.

Gamasutra is reaching out to parties in the video game industry most likely to be affected by the deal for further information on its impact, and will update with any comment we receive.

[UPDATE: On a call to investors attended by consumer weblog Kotaku, Disney said it's unlikely to take the entirety of Marvel video game development in-house.

"On the video game front, (Marvel) have some smart licensing agreements with some of the best video game manufacturers in the business," Disney investor relations SVP Lowell Singer said. "While we have been steadily moving in the direction of video game integration, we don't rule out the blend of licensing and self-produced and distributed video games."

"As these licensing deals expire we have the luxury of considering what's best for the company and the products."

According to Kotaku, Disney SVP Tom Staggs also said he sees "real opportunity" in Marvel's broad character library, and that the company would look at "how we can leverage those across both Marvel and Disney."

In a phone call with Gamasutra, Disney VP of strategic communications Jonathan Friedland added, "Activision, THQ, and so on -- these are companies that Disney has worked with in the past, and I don't see a huge amount of problems here [in regards to licensing deals]...]
 
   
 
Comments

Brighton gardiner
profile image
$4 Billion?!
I am speechless.

Aaron Casillas
profile image
Love the Marvel logo in the article, the more money you make as a super hero the further you get to be upfront!:)

Mark Morrison
profile image
This is a huge bummer IMO. The chances are good that Marvel IP, Disney IP, as well as the licensing models that involve them with external productions will be adversely affected in the long term. I hope I am wrong.

This transaction also consolidates an already shrinking group of mass market IP licensors, creating more monopoly and less competition. Historically, this has not been good for consumers. Who knows, maybe we'll see Mogli and Pinnochio return with super powers?

Bryan OHara
profile image
wow, this is huge.

Samuel Fiunte Matarredona
profile image
WOW!

Incredible...hope they kick out Quesada and Bendis and their endless string of bad artistic (no commercials...yet) decisions and continue crossover madness!!!

weŽll have to wait and see how it turns out and affects marvel!

Christian Keichel
profile image
I don't see how Disney can make profit from this deal in the forseeable future, right now, Super Hero Movies are big, but 4 Billion US$ are a ridiculous ammount of money anyway.

Christian Keichel
profile image
"Incredible...hope they kick out Quesada and Bendis and their endless string of bad artistic (no commercials...yet) decisions and continue crossover madness!!!

weŽll have to wait and see how it turns out and affects marvel! "

I think it will affect Marvel strongly, they will be forced to put out much more material, that can be licensed, more Comics, that can be turned into TV-Shows, that then can be turned in Toys, so that the industry can develop Videogames based on this Toylines. I think it will be the creative death for Marvel.

Dave Smith
profile image
i dont see how this can possibly be a good thing for fans. sucks.

Joseph Cassano
profile image
Wow. Just, wow.

Christian Nutt
profile image
X-Men in Kingdom Hearts confirmed

Lo Pan
profile image
Very interesting news....Jonas Brothers in the Runaways movie? Hannah Montana as Songbird in MUA3? :-)

Tom Abernathy
profile image
Leigh, far be it from me to critique your writing, which is generally picture perfect... but I'm not sure "scion" means what you think it means there... ;P

Derek Saclolo
profile image
This is great news for Disney!

Now they need to get rid of the Hannah Montana and High School Musical franchises and bring creativity back to the Disney name. Nickelodeon can have them.

Tom Abernathy
profile image
Oh, wait -- unless you meant ME is the descendant of Marvel Comics. In which case, you're still perfect and I'll shut up. :-)

Sean Parton
profile image
I know Capcom is normally the one who takes care of the series, but the first thing that popped into my mind was a Marvel vs. Disney fighting game. Does that make me a bad person?

Jeferson Soler
profile image
Well, Parton, if Capcom ever decide to do Marvel Vs. Capcom 3, then they could have Scrooge McDuck guest star in the game and side with the Capcom characters. By the way, I'm being serious about this, as I really liked Duck Tales by Capcom for the NES. In that regard, it is not impossible for a Disney character (or a character from Duck Tales, to be more precise) to guest star in a Capcom game.

Eric Carr
profile image
No Sean, it doesn't. I want to see Strider Hiryu Aerial Rave Mickey too.

Either way, I can see no (other) real good coming from this. But I could be wrong.

Roberto Alfonso
profile image
@Derek: Get rid of Montana and, High School Musical, their best selling properties (which incidentally likely sell more than all Marvel IPs)? Don't think so.

I didn't know Disney was still this powerful, I thought they were already on their way down.

Doug Poston
profile image
@ Roberto Alfonso: Disney's game business is declining, but the company as a whole still made something like $37 billion last year.

Given Disney's marketing talent, I wouldn't be surprised if they can make back the $4 billion selling plush Spiderman dolls alone. ;)

Lance Rund
profile image
Remember, the early Mickey Mouse cartoons go public domain in 9 years. While this doesn't cede use of the trademarks, it does mean that Disney is going to be losing some control of some portion of its core intellectual property. When faced with that, diversifying your IP holdings (and in this case, buying something that's been recently successful) is an understandable thing to do.

Will it work out? Maybe. Disney has a mixed record... the Pixar deal is great, buying ESPN worked really well, ABC not so good, they haven't done anything with the Jim Henson properties, and what's this funny thing called the Go network? We'll see. In the meantime, we'll wait for the cool new rides that Dizzyland will be putting in... THAT'S the only important thing, after all!

Kristian Roberts
profile image
This is a sad sad day for the comic world. How can my house of angsty, angry, agitated super heroes stand up to the onslaught of disney's corpro-super-hackism. Stan must not be too pleased...unless he got a fat cheque (which I hope he did). The first Spiderman-Goofie crossover will be interesting...

Well at least there bound to be more comic-themed shows on ABC in the morning...

*sigh*

Dan Saundberg
profile image
IMO: Great deal for both parties!

Disney did this deal to attract more boys, sell more merchandise and access a catalog of 5.000 characters, of witch about 10 are household names. Marvel will keep it's independence, gain financial stability and access to the huge resources that Disney has.

Last i read only Disneyland Europe was doing money, so i doubt any new theme-parks are on the horizon.

DIS still has plenty of money to make further acquisitions. Rumored next target is for them to buy a game publisher. I wonder witch one they will approach ... I am doubtful that either ERTS or ATVI are predisposed to such a deal but troubled THQI, or Ubisoft (great character driven IPs)? Perhaps TTWO since they didn't merge with ERTS may be persuaded to become the gaming branch of Disney... Only time will tell.

Rob Schatz
profile image
"Activision, THQ, and so on ...." Well Activision is out, so THQ must be top on their list to acquire. Need For Speed Mickey?

Ishaan Sahdev
profile image
@Christian Nutt: Maybe now they'll let Nomura put in his chainsaw.

Hillwins Lee
profile image
$4 billions.......Hmm.....So...instead of Marvel vs Capcom, we will have a Disney vs Marvel soon? Would be cool to see Ironman fighting Mickey.

Adam Piotuch
profile image
This is truly a sad day. :'(

JB Vorderkunz
profile image
I have to agree with the Nays. Will there be an existing IP that Disney doesn't own within the next ten years? Disney has let ESPN do it's own thing for the most part, but that's a whole different ballgame <.< >.> -.- , ahem. I don't know if Marvel will really remain unchanged; it's kinda dark these days compared to Disney's usual style.

Dan Saundberg
profile image
Knowing the marvel editors like i know, if they are not happy with Dis, they will cash in their stock and start a new shop. It's not the first time something like that has happened. However i for one am hopeful that the deal will be beneficial for all, including the consumer.

Paul Waterman
profile image
I don't see where giving Marvel access to resources that Disney, Buena Vista, Pixar ...et al, have enjoyed would be a bad thing. Actually seeing the difference between Marvels outsourced ventures and those same ventures remade in-house (or at least under their direct creative control), this could be another great step up for Marvel. However, it's quite scarey when the big dopey mouse can fatfinger creative control away from the creators of such endearing characters. Disney has a 'decent' record of keeping their balloons away from sharp objects once they buy them, let's hope that favors Marvel.

Peter Dwyer
profile image
Given Marvels recent success I'm still trying to figure out why the heck they sold out to Disney in the first place. It can't have been for the money as they simply don't need it. I also can't see any longterm benefits for them either. Is Stan Lee about to kick the bucket or something and they wanted shot of the company before that happened?

Samuel Fiunte Matarredona
profile image
I still think that we all should wait and see.....it could be a good move, or just turn everything into a mud of crap and shitty products....depends of wich strategy do they choose. Anyway I dind-t like either Marvel or DC these last 3 or 4 years. Both released some great comics, and lots of crap....and both have fallen back to the returning tide of the mega-hyper-ultra BIG crossover one per year...this happened in the 80's (Secret wars, The original crisis), It happened in the 90's (Age of apocalypse and in dc...i Dunno...Zero Hour? was superman's death a crossover? don'r remember right now) and it's happening again....the editors onle need a great hit to be doing it every year, and the next, and the next one...till things get exhausted. But enough of my rant about comics, this is a videogame site (wich just in case, I think that the idea for ultimate alliance 2 is really awful, it looks like a creepy copycat of Dragon Ball Z and its fusion features).

Mark Morrison
profile image
@Pete: $200M net for marvel this year is far less than what I thought Marvel was generating. reading between those lines, there must have been a lot of exec. salary affecting bottom line. add to that they have been funding their own movies...and yet more over the top salaries. also, stan lee has had a first look deal with disney for a while now. these appear to have been signals.

it does seem like a perfect bail out for both companies to benefit, and here we consumers sit, ready for the onslaught IP butter churning. "bring out yer dead"


none
 
Comment:
 




 
UBM Techweb
Game Network
Game Developers Conference | GDC Europe | GDC Online | GDC China | Gamasutra | Game Developer Magazine | Game Advertising Online
Game Career Guide | Independent Games Festival | Indie Royale | IndieGames

Other UBM TechWeb Networks
Business Technology | Business Technology Events | Telecommunications & Communications Providers

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Copyright © UBM TechWeb, All Rights Reserved.