Our Properties: Gamasutra GameCareerGuide IndieGames Indie Royale GDC IGF Game Developer Magazine GAO
My Message close
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
February 10, 2012
 
DICE 2012: Activision's Hirshberg believes creative people should lead companies
 
DICE 2012: EA's Galda says television's episodic model is the future of game narrative
 
GDC 2012 reveals Super Mario 3D Land, Resident Evil Revelations postmortems
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
February 10, 2012
 
arrow Virtual Goods - An Excerpt from Social Game Design: Monetization Methods and Mechanics [1]
 
arrow Principles of an Indie Game Bottom Feeder [21]
 
arrow Postmortem: CyberConnect 2's Solatorobo: Red the Hunter [1]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
February 10, 2012
 
The Parable of Feudal Japan [1]
 
Audio Passes: Success Through Layering
 
What the current RPG can learn from Diablo 1
 
Double Fine's Kickstarter Windfall: Will Patronage Supplant Traditional Game Publishing? [10]
 
The Principles of Game Monetization
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
February 10, 2012
 
Retro Studios
RETRO CONTRACT - Environmental Artist
 
Retro Studios
RETRO - CONTRACT AI Engineer
 
Adhesive Games
UI Technical Artist
 
Adhesive Games
Technical Artist
 
Adhesive Games
Senior Network Engineer
 
Adhesive Games
Senior Engine Programmer
spacer
Latest Press Releases
spacer View All     RSS spacer
 
February 10, 2012
 
Eufloria HD App for iPad
Arrives on the App Store
 
PARAMOUNT PICTURES AND
NAMCO BANDAI TEAM UP
FOR...
 
EA AND 38 STUDIOS SHIP
ONE OF THE MOST HIGHLY...
 
Indie Royale's
Valentine's Bundle is
live
 
SUPPORT YOUR FAVORITE
NARUTO NINJA TEAM IN
NARUTO...
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief/News Director:
Kris Graft
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Frank Cifaldi, Tom Curtis, Mike Rose, Eric Caoili, Kris Graft
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
 
Comment Guidelines
Sponsor
News

  Microsoft Allows Gamertags To Reflect Sexual Orientation, Personal Beliefs
by Leigh Alexander [PC, Console/PC]
22 comments
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
March 5, 2010
 
Microsoft Allows Gamertags To Reflect Sexual Orientation, Personal Beliefs

Microsoft is making changes to its Xbox Live Code of Conduct to expand the kinds of Gamertags it allows -- which means users can now have tags that indicate their sexual orientation, religion or race.

The change will come in particular as welcome news to a community of gay gamers who have found Microsoft's prohibition on the word "gay" anywhere in their Gamertag to be discriminatory.

Bans of such users have been widely publicized in recent years, and hotly disputed. Microsoft has always contended its intent was to protect users from harassment, and to prevent users from creating Gamertags that insulted, rather than celebrated orientation, religion or nationality.

"Under our previous policy, some of these expressions of self-identification were not allowed in Gamertags or profiles to prevent the use of these terms as insults or slurs," says Xbox Live general manager Marc Whitten in a public statement.

"However, we have since heard feedback from our customers that while the spirit of this approach was genuine, it inadvertently excluded a part of our Xbox Live community," he adds.

This new update to the Code of Conduct "will allow our members to more freely express their race, nationality, religion and sexual orientation in Gamertags and profiles," he says.

According to Whitten, Microsoft will employ "increased stringency and enforcement to prevent the misuse of these terms."
 
   
 
Comments

brandon sheffield
profile image
very interesting to see how this will play out.

Robert C.
profile image
Good for Microsoft - it's going to be a tough road for them. Without bright-line criteria, it's going to be all judgment calls and that means that there will be a lot of mistakes. But I hope that people will be patient with them while they figure things out.

Tom Abernathy
profile image
Nice write-up, Leigh.

As a Microsoft FTE coming up on my second anniversary, I can say that one thing that was crystal-clear to me from the first moment of my New Employee Orientation session was that MS is deeply committed at this point to diversity in all senses, with a particular emphasis on sexual orientation and transgender (which is a relatively big community in Seattle). While my long-timer Microsoftie colleagues have told me stories that indicate this wasn't necessarily always made manifest in the company's actions, it is certainly so now. Robert's right that this will be a difficult line to walk, but I'm proud of MS for taking the leap.

Tom Abernathy
profile image
I think maybe you misunderstood, Andre. They're not forcing anyone to disclose anything. They're allowing people who want to make a public statement about themselves in that way to do so. (They've made this decision, as Leigh describes, in response to customer feedback.)

Your secrets are still safe, whatever they are. :-)

Michael Will
profile image
@Andre Thomas: "what microsoft is doing is borderline invasive."

What are you talking about? It's the players choice to give out personal information in their gamer tag. MS isn't invading any ones privacy here.

Did you read the article or did you just read the headline and then start typing?

Allen Turner
profile image
Uhm, I don't see how this is invasive. I can see how this can be dangerous (like every other social network out there) but not invasive. It gives you the option of celebrating something you're proud of that you wan to be known. That is, of course, if you don't want it to be known. This is an opt in thing not the Mutant Registration Act. If you, like me, prefer to remain as anonymous as possible to the masses of XBL then you put nothing more than a snazzy tag. If you don't want to know about people then you are free to only play with people who don't tell you too much info. I'd definitely not allow my kids to have anything more than a cool tag name. In any case the world is made up of different types of people. Some of us are more introverted, some are more extroverted. Some want you to know a little bit about them some don't. To each his/her own.

I take my hat off to MS for giving people options. Now lets just hope that people will use it responsibly. We all know that there are an obnoxious few that will try to be as abusive as possible. The sooner we get over that hurdle the better.

Alan Rimkeit
profile image
While I see this as being the right step forward we all know what kind of attitude lots of individuals have on XBL. Tea bagging, racial slurs, sexual slurs, and the like abound. Anyone who is openly gay on XBL is painting a target on their backs as an invitation for the ignorant and insensitive to barrage them with insults most people would not dare to say in person. Personally if I was gay I would never reveal it to anyone on XBL. It is just not worth it. But that is just me. Microsoft had better prepare the ban hammer now to stave off the jerks.

Dave Smith
profile image
URSoGhey69 is back on the prowl! yes!

but if MS wouldnt have made such a big deal about it, there would probably be less idiots with insulting gamertags in the first place.

Stephen Horn
profile image
As much as I /want/ to agree that this is a net positive thing for the people who want to celebrate their identity, I can't help but feel that MS's original policy was the better decision, net net. I think far more people are going to abuse this new policy. This is the internet, after all.

Jonathan Arsenault
profile image
Oh jesus... fear the new wave of Faggot themed users! Flawless victory from the GNAA once again...

Will H
profile image
This will make playing Modern Warfare very interesting. Brodcasting your sexual lifestyle as a gamertag is like pouring gasoline on an already burning fire. This should be fun to watch this train wreck. Way to go PC/MS.

Alan Rimkeit
profile image
Who cares what sexual orientation of anyone online is? I simply do not give a crap, ever. Either when I am blasting fools and chumps in Unreal Tournament or debating geeky stuff on some tech website it never comes to my mind. Why should it? I do not get why anyone has to trumpet it ever. I am not a homophobic and have gay family members, as in more than one. But I still don't ever think about it. I respect their rights to be openly gay but question why they need to be so on a place like XBL. That goes for straight people too. Or even religious persuasion. None of it matters when gaming online.

Dave Endresak
profile image
I think the more interesting angle is that people seem to be willing to believe what someone says in their profile online. After all, you can say anything. In addition, one person's definition of the meaning of a category may differ from someone else's definition of the same category. That's why communication skills are important offline as well as online.

@ Alan:

It's great that you do not pay any attention to categorizations such as sexual orientation. However, I'm sure you know that some people do pay attention to such things. That's why you have specific guilds/clans, etc in various MMOs, for example, or groups of people in real life. It would be nice if we could get past the idea of creating categories and then trying to slot people into them while generalizing the members with categorical traits/definitions. We seem to be a very long way from such a goal, though.

Alan Rimkeit
profile image
@Dave

Yes Dave you are right society in general is very far from such a state of being. And that is a sad thing indeed.

Robert C.
profile image
Ever notice how people who talk about being "color-blind" are always white? It's easy to say that it doesn't matter when you're in the majority. When you're in the minority, it's a much bigger deal - it's impossible to forget the thing that makes you different from everybody else.

Adam Bishop
profile image
While I don't disagree with Microsoft's decision here, I still feel like the easiest thing to do would just have been to *talk* to people who were banned for this sort of thing and find out whether it was meant as a slur or was just an expression of identity. There was no real need to overhaul the profile system, just a need to listen to people who had been treated unfairly.

Michael Will
profile image
Personally I think the easiest way to go about it would be to keep the old policy but simply allow exceptions to be determined on a case by case basis without public disclosure of the fact that exceptions would be allowed. Changing the policy and marking the change with a press release just invites more problems and a hell of a lot more work.

Ryan Duffin
profile image
Adam and Michael; Xbox Live has what, 20 million users? Talking to individuals on a case-by-case basis among a population bigger then many entire countries has certain financial and logistical challenges. On top of that, who is going to make these case-by-case decisions? The Xbox Live call center operators in India?

As far as I read, the profile system wasn't 'overhauled'; the code of conduct was changed. Relaxing rules for everyone is a bit simpler task then giving sincerity tests to millions and millions of users.

Meredith Katz
profile image
I'm so happy to finally see this, honestly. After that incident with the woman who was banned on X-Box for saying she was a lesbian in her profile... It had honestly been a big part in my decision as to which next-gen console to purchase, let's just leave it at that.

Meredith Katz
profile image
Stone Bytes:

Previously, people could be banned for saying as much in their profiles, which they could put up for reasons such as:
- being overly-sappy couples who want to brag (you know, like straight people do)
- trying to discourage guys from hitting on them if they're girls
- Wanting to point out that despite being an invisible minority we're present in games (the whole thing about games not being designed with characters who might reflect the minority being that most people can't see the minority, or dispel the myth that games are a straight space only)
- Wanting to find a community to friend and play with who aren't likely to sling homophobic slurs around because, guess what, they're gay too.
- just about any other social reason.

Ditto religion, ditto race.

...Anything that has a social element, people can mention these things for many personal reasons. Being banned over it is absurd. Previously, people were. Now they won't be. Great news imho.

Meredith Katz
profile image
http://www.joystiq.com/2009/02/26/consumerist-self-identified-lesbian-banned-fro
m-xbox-live/

Some information from an incident one year ago almost exactly.

Meredith Katz
profile image
Stone: Have to admit, I didn't think of it that way.


none
 
Comment:
 




 
UBM Techweb
Game Network
Game Developers Conference | GDC Europe | GDC Online | GDC China | Gamasutra | Game Developer Magazine | Game Advertising Online
Game Career Guide | Independent Games Festival | Indie Royale | IndieGames

Other UBM TechWeb Networks
Business Technology | Business Technology Events | Telecommunications & Communications Providers

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Copyright © UBM TechWeb, All Rights Reserved.