Our Properties: Gamasutra GameCareerGuide IndieGames Indie Royale GDC IGF Game Developer Magazine GAO
My Message close
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
What Nintendo's 2011 sales mean for Wii U, third parties [1]
 
DICE 2012: Culture, pride lead to success at Skyrim maker Bethesda [4]
 
DICE 2012: Is the publishing model broken? [16]
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
arrow Postmortem: CyberConnect 2's Solatorobo: Red the Hunter
 
arrow Jerked Around by the Magic Circle - Clearing the Air Ten Years Later [32]
 
arrow Building the World of Reckoning [4]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
Did DoubleFine Just break the publishing model for good?
 
The Devil Is in the Details of Action RPGs - Part One: The Logistics of Loot [2]
 
Xbox LIVE Indie Games at it Again
 
Merging Waterfall and SCRUM [3]
 
Business Post Mortem: Wolf Toss: Pre-launch Planning & Blended CAC
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
Sony Computer Entertainment America LLC
Senior On-line Programmer
 
Radical Entertainment / Activision
AI Programmer (Senior)
 
Visual Concepts
Senior Producer, VC China (Shanghai)
 
Visual Concepts
Software Engineer, VC China (Shanghai)
 
2K Marin
FX Artist - XCOM
 
Visceral Games Redwood Shores
Sr. Gameplay Engineer-Visceral Games
spacer
Latest Press Releases
spacer View All     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
CANINE SUPERSTAR UGGIE
LANDS EPIC ROLE AS
NINTENDO...
 
DEMOS AND DOWNLOADABLE
CONTENT FOR NAMCO
BANDAI...
 
Warhorse Studios Licensed
CryENGINE®3 to...
 
Best Battlers to Win
Signed Copies of
‘The...
 
THQ ANNOUNCES ONLINE
FEATURE SET DETAILS FOR
UFC...
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief/News Director:
Kris Graft
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Frank Cifaldi, Tom Curtis, Mike Rose, Eric Caoili, Kris Graft
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
 
Comment Guidelines
Sponsor
News

  GDC Europe: PopCap's Kapalka talks Bejeweled Blitz Origins, Calls Social Games 'A Bit Evil'
by Brandon Sheffield [PC, Console/PC]
3 comments
Share on Twitter
Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
August 18, 2010
 
GDC Europe: PopCap's Kapalka talks  Bejeweled Blitz  Origins, Calls Social Games 'A Bit Evil'

Bejeweled Blitz is one of two top-20 Facebook games that didn't take a huge dive after the much-discussed "nerfing" of some of the viral aspects of wall posts for the service. This is primarily because the game was developed without monetization and viral aspects in mind, PopCap creative director Jason Kapalka explains.

In the beginning, PopCap knew it wanted to make a Facebook game, but "Unfortunately there was not a single flash developer in the entire company," PopCap creative director Jason Kapalka said, addressing a crowd at GDC Europe. "The second problem was that at that time nobody actually liked Facebook games." When the game was being created, in 2008, most games on the service were still of the vampires or werewolf "biting" variety.

So the team took stock of what they had. They had a half-finished Bejeweled 2 port from an external company that went bankrupt, and one guy in customer support who had taught himself Flash in his spare time. They also knew they didn't want to do a straight port of Bejeweled. Other casual companies at the time had done straight demo ports, which would lead the user to buy a product elsewhere, and didn't really take advantage of Facebook in any way.

Building An Early Facebook Game

"The first thing was the realization that it had to be a short game," said Kapalka. Initially they put a five minute timer on the game, allowing you to score points within that time limit. "That turned out to be quite long, and pretty boring," he admitted. They tried 4 minutes, then 3, then two. Then at one point when searching for bugs, they turned the limit down to 10 seconds, and discovered people liked playing a 10 second game more than a 2 minute game - so they went with 1 minute, which seemed to be the perfect match.

But it was too skill-based at the time, and good players could always beat more casual ones. To fix that, the team added some randomizing elements, such as multiplier gems, which randomly show up and increase a player's score dramatically. But they wanted to reward skill as well, so they put in a speed bonus for those who could compete faster.

Additionally, the team made it so their tournament boards reset every week. "We found that having a single leaderboard was an important thing, he said, and as far as resetting, in two weeks players would not play again if they got a good score. Once per week works much better. "We tend to see a huge surge in players on those Tuesdays [when the game resets] when people come in and try to set their scores for the week," he said.

The team also implemented a team score, to invite their friends to compete in a group. Team scorers could win a prize in various competitions, but many players were skeptical that PopCap could be giving something away for free when the game wasn't even monetized yet.

"It's actually unclear whether this has increased the popularity," admitted Kapalka. For example, PopCap did a competition with Mazda to win a car, and expected an increase in players due to that. Curiously, numbers remained the same. "There are people who say this was critical to the success of the project, but honestly we don't have the data to support that idea."

The game was released in December 2008, but with no monetization plans at launch. PopCap later implemented the ability to buy special powers in-game. "You can earn the coins by playing," he says, "but you'll never really earn enough to get as many boosts as you want." While the company is continuing to consider its monetization options, "to be honest our efforts to do that are pretty minimal compared to other companies," said Kapalka.

Other Platforms

Bejeweled 2 was popular on the iPhone, but started to falter by 2009. So the team figured they should work Bejeweled Blitz in somewhere to revitalize the brand on that platform. They decided to add a Blitz mode to the original game, rather than making a new stand-alone Bejeweled game for the iPhone, so as not to fracture the audience. But the question became, should they, and could they sync the game with the Facebook version?

De-synced Mafia Wars wasn't successful on the iPhone because you couldn't bring your character over, so "we figured we had to sync up the leaderboards, at least," concluded Kapalka. Because of Apple's approvals process, you can't sync other elements too easily, because you can't predict when it's going to launch, so they kept features separate.

One issue that cropped up was the adjustment of scoring across platforms, when players are competing for the same scores using different interfaces. "We did a lot of tests to see if one was easier, and it turned out that the iPhone one was a little easier." They tweaked this, but it's still not totally the same.

With the addition of the Blitz mode, Bejeweled 2 went back into top 10, and now boasts total sales in the 4 million range. After this they decided to add a third platform, making a PC downloadable version. This was even tougher to integrate, as Facebook has no integrated Win32 API, meaning the team had to build a custom web browser in the client, based on Chromium, in order to integrate features and leaderboards. This approach "has some minor drawbacks if Facebook makes some changes to their systems," he says, since that makes the whole thing completely break.

Standard portals were reluctant to carry the PC version, he says. "They didn't like the idea of a connected game where players were able to connect to not only Facebook, but also PopCap. There's some truth to that concern, but I think it's inevitable," he added. "Portals are going to have to get used to the idea or get left behind."

Social Games Are Evil

"We learned that social games are quite different from standard games," he says. "Social games are kind of evil right now. People that are complaining have a valid point. Viral feeds that are really kind of critical, are a big generator of noise. There's no way around it."

"If you were doing something on your mobile phone, and you had a thing where you sent a text message to everyone in your phonebook about your mafia or your cow, you'd very quickly have fewer friends," he says, saying that viral feeds are a perversion of the intended use of the channel. "They're trying to find any way to trick you into posting something on your wall that's not really even of interest to you, let alone your friends."

"A large part of the social game industry is about finding loopholes in the system," rather than making fun games, says Kapalka. This made PopCap really uncomfortable. "We found that was quite disturbing, and we had to kind of get over that as we were making it."

Kapalka says PopCap can't claim to be completely non-evil, but they came up with some golden rules:

1. Make games that are fun to play. "It seems obvious, but often social games are starting from another point, like a monetization trick." Their games have to not be excuses for spam, not be built around monetization, not designed to irritate or shame people (a la the idea of FarmVille's crops withering), and not simple copies of others' hits.

2. If you find a game fun, other people will too (probably). "If you don't think it's fun, why are you even making games in the first place?" Kapalka poses.

3. If people have fun with a game, viral mechanics are a natural outgrowth. As a subrule regarding feeds, the team asks itself: "Would I post this to my own wall? If I did, would people unfriend me? Is it just a way to spam my pals?"

4. Of people enjoy a game, you will probably find a way to make money from it. "In our case, it's definitely worked," he said.
 
   
 
Comments

Gregory Kinneman
profile image
I have a question about your opinion on rule #1 in the event of a social game combined with a serious game. A game that serves to teach or educate or make one aware of important issues, but built withing the social-game space. In that case, would you feel that it could be acceptable to reduce the importance of rule #2? Could it be compelling, demand introspection into one's real life, and encourage social change, without having a primary focus on fun? Does disregarding rule #1 make a game evil? Without digging too deeply into the "do games have to be fun" question do you feel that perhaps rule #1 too broad? By extension, would a game that isn't necessarily fun be able to achieve commercial success and virality?

scott stevens
profile image
I think educational games still need to be focused on fun. If your calling your product a "game", but you aren't concerned with the primary fun factor, then maybe you're not really making a game.

You could be making a simulation, or an interactive experience, but if it's not fun, it's not a game.

That being said, games can still teach - but they have to be fun first.

david canela
profile image
I was there at the GDC Europe talk and came away impressed. Looks like popcap not only know how to make great games, but also manage to maintain certain ethical standards. As a student, I'm aspiring to work in an industry that thrives on providing valuable experiences to its customers, not on generating the loudest noise and capitalising on silly social pressures.


none
 
Comment:
 




 
UBM Techweb
Game Network
Game Developers Conference | GDC Europe | GDC Online | GDC China | Gamasutra | Game Developer Magazine | Game Advertising Online
Game Career Guide | Independent Games Festival | Indie Royale | IndieGames

Other UBM TechWeb Networks
Business Technology | Business Technology Events | Telecommunications & Communications Providers

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Copyright © UBM TechWeb, All Rights Reserved.