| Jacob Barlaam |
|
I think the system in place is fine, parents need to stop whining and do some research about games. The system is similar to the movie rating system, parents just don't seem to make the connection for whatever reason. E = PG, T = PG13, M = R, AO = NC17. Stop blaming others for your sub standard parenting and actually try and check what your kids are playing. Too many times i have seen a 8 year old playing the airport mission of MW2 with parent having bought the game randomly because they didn't seem to have any kind of common sense. In my eyes, this is exactly the same as the movies. If you want to know about the movie and if it is going to be good and appropriate, you go online and do some research. I feel no sympathy for these stupid parents.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
| Tom Baird |
|
I'm curious if they think the same about the Movie system.
If they want to regulate what their child is doing, they are going to have to actually pay attention to what their child is doing. The ESRB is doing everything it can, but you can't teach ignorant people with a refusal to take responsibility. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
| Jordan Lynn |
|
Skewed.
1) The use of the phrase "Ultra-violent" automatically skews the respondent. 2) Not establishing whether or not participants KNOW what the industry is doing invalidates the percentage that say "they aren't doing enough." 3) The proposed law has NOTHING to do with media consumption, but rather restricting sales. Also, "What we’ve learned from this poll is that parents want to be the ones who decide which games their kids play, not the video game industry," Streyer adds. The industry didn't hand your 12-year-old the 65 bucks it costs to buy the newest, shiniest gorefest. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
| James Patton |
|
A video that shows "the type of video game under discussion in [the Supreme Court] case."
Well, no, not really! Those are extreme examples which show video games in an extremely negative light and would horrify any parent. The fact is, the court case deals with all violent video games: this ranges from games in which you cut people to pieces to games in which you fight through WW2. The video is entirely unbalanced and does not show games in anything like the light they deserve. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
| James Trinklein |
|
I think that these parents should take a class on using the Parental Controls found on all the gaming systems. I'm pretty sure this is the exact reason why parental controls even exist.
|
|
|
| Josh ua |
|
Many parents are idiots and would like anything that takes responsibility off their shoulders. Many of them would have the state raise their children if they could (although teachers these days pretty much do have to act as parents in addition to teachers). How about watching what your kids are playing instead of using video games as babysitters when you aren't around.
|
|
|
| Vin St John |
|
|
"What we’ve learned from this poll is that parents want to the government to be the ones who decide which games their kids play, not themselves."
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
| Alan Rimkeit |
|
|
72% of those polled don't care about their First Amendment Rights nor Freedom of Speech either, if they even really know what those things are in the first place are. The bloody sheep. BBBBBAAAAHHHHHHH!!!!.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
| Ian Fisch |
|
|
I'm guessing 72% of people don't realize that movie content isn't restricted by law (except for porn), and that the G,PG,PG13,R system is not enforced by the government.
|
|
|
| David Tarris |
|
Even if the 72% figure is accurate, it just goes to show why America is fundamentally not a democracy. The Bill of Rights was written to protect those liberties considered fundamental from any act of law, even those imposed through the "tyranny of the majority".
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
| Jason Patterson |
|
The main group to blame for children playing ultra-violent games is not anyone in the industry. The ones at fault are lazy parents that don't take enough time to read a simple label on a video game before buying it for their children. It isn't a difficult task to do. Also, if a parent catches their children playing a video game that's far too violent the game could simply be taken away. End of problem. Government involvement is not needed for either of these solutions and both would be cheaper than adding a new bureaucracy to the mix that's good for nothing but providing an excuse to make a dedicated video game tax to fun the agency.
|
|
|
| Micah Wright |
|
|
65% of Americans also thought invading Iraq was a good idea. Look how well THAT turned out.
Lawmaking via opinion polls is the worst possible governmental structure. |
|
|
More: Console/PC