Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
October 2, 2014
arrowPress Releases
October 2, 2014
PR Newswire
View All

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

UK-Based  RuneScape  Dev Jagex Wins Patent Infringement Lawsuit
UK-Based RuneScape Dev Jagex Wins Patent Infringement Lawsuit
November 17, 2010 | By Kris Graft

November 17, 2010 | By Kris Graft
More: Console/PC

A U.S. District Court judge has dismissed a patent infringement lawsuit brought against RuneScape developer Jagex, but not before the UK studio spent a purported seven figures defending itself.

Judge David Folsom last week dismissed online chat company Paltalk's claims that Jagex infringed on Paltalk patents relating to online network communications, according to court documents obtained by Gamasutra.

"After reviewing source code for the RuneScape video game made available by Jagex, Paltalk and Jagex agree that the RuneScape video game does not infringe the patents-in-suit," wrote the judge. "Accordingly, judgment of non-infringement is entered in this case."

RuneScape is a free-to-play MMORPG that launched in 2001, and at the time of the suit's filing had around 10 million active players per month. Andrew and Paul Gower, founders of the Cambridge, UK-based studio, earlier this year were listed among the country's wealthiest game entrepreneurs.

Along with Jagex, Paltalk also sued game companies Sony Computer Entertainment America, Sony Online Entertainment, Sony Corp., Activision Blizzard, Blizzard Entertainment, NCsoft and Turbine, accusing them all of infringing on the same patents, 5,822,523 and 6,226,686 titled "Server-group messaging system for interactive applications."

The judge's ruling only resolved Jagex's case. Microsoft settled with Paltalk for an undisclosed sum in 2009 after the online communication technology company sued over the patents in a $90 million claim. That settlement opened the door to Paltalk claims against other game companies. Paltalk alleged in the Jagex-related suit that it had suffered "tens of millions of dollars" in damages.

The judge said that the order of non-infringement is final, with both Jagex and Paltalk waiving the right to appeal the ruling. Both parties are to cover their own legal fees.

The ruling favors Jagex, but for company CEO Mark Gerhard, the damage is already done. "It is exceedingly unfortunate that the U.S. legal system can force a company with a sole presence in Cambridge, UK to incur a seven-digit expense and waste over a year of management time on a case with absolutely no merit," he said in a statement.

"This anomaly, which could easily break smaller studios, doesn’t happen in the UK since you can pursue frivolous litigants for the costs of such claims," he added. "We are particularly disappointed that Paltalk did not, at any stage prior to filing the lawsuit, seek to contact us to clarify that Jagex’s game platform did not infringe Paltalk’s patents."

While a settlement may have have been less costly than drawn-out litigation, Gerhard said that Jagex "will not hesitate to vigorously defend our position against any patent trolls who bring lawsuits against us in the future." Reps for Paltalk did not immediately return request for comment.

Related Jobs

Vicarious Visions / Activision
Vicarious Visions / Activision — Albany, New York, United States

Character Artist-Vicarious Visions
Sucker Punch Productions
Sucker Punch Productions — Bellevue, Washington, United States

Concept Artist
Red 5 Studios
Red 5 Studios — Laguna Hills, California, United States

Web Developer/Web Architect
Halo — Kirkland, Washington, United States

Senior AI Engineer


Alan Rimkeit
profile image
Sounds like a great time for a counter suit to retrieve the monies spent on said legal defense! Sue the hell out Paltalk Jagex! Sue them but good! Damn patent trolls. >:(

Christer Kaitila
profile image
Jagex, please for the love of smaller companies who can't afford to fight the evil patent trolls, countersue this bastard with all your might. I would bet money that every single multiplayer game developer here on Gamasutra has violated Paltalk's patents and we are all at risk until those patents are revoked.

Patents hurt programmers. All software patents are unethical.

The patent system is broken, and only greedy lawyers like patents.

Please refer to for more information.

Alan Rimkeit
profile image
+1 X 1,000,000. O.O

Eric Cartman
profile image

Its absolutely ridiculous. Between hierarchical skeletal animation going up for grabs, Nintendo getting sued for "a device that tracks a user's location in 3d space", and this, I honestly don't know how the patent system hasn't been revised.

Like the rest, +1.

Scott Southurst
profile image
lol at the US PTO. Have a look at the first reference patent for #6226686 (#4470954) and tell me how that relates to the patent in question.

It really shows that there should be a "MAFIAA" organisation set up for funding the defence of these law suits and agressive litigation against these patent trolls. If the US system doesn't allow Jagex to recover it's costs, then perhaps they can do so through the UK system. After all if Jagex can be dragged to the US to defend this crap, why can't the troll be dragged to the UK?

Eric Cartman
profile image
An organization that funds the defense of the non-trolls and the litigation of trolls, buys up patents that could fall into the hands of trolls, and lobbies against software patents.

Now that I would donate to.

Alan Rimkeit
profile image
Like I donate to the EFF, I would donate to such an organization as well to fight any and all patent trolls around the world.

Jeffrey Crenshaw
profile image
"It is exceedingly unfortunate that the U.S. legal system can force a company with a sole presence in Cambridge, UK to incur a seven-digit expense and waste over a year of management time on a case with absolutely no merit,"

Unfortunate indeed :/

Giro Maioriello
profile image
It doesn't help when a company like Microsoft folds and pays out. Thus giving these kinds of people both the funds and the impetuous to pursue other companies.

Gena Patent
profile image
Now that everyone's jumping on the NPE bandwagon, being an NPE (or "patent troll") has almost become downright respectable lately. There is one reason that the NPE business model has become increasingly popular: it works. It is also legal, and often helps protect independent inventors and SMEs from exploitation of their intellectual property by larger, more powerful entities. Like it or not, NPEs are here to stay.