Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
July 23, 2014
arrowPress Releases
July 23, 2014
PR Newswire
View All

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

Piracy Opponents Introduce New, Broader Bill In U.S. Congress
Piracy Opponents Introduce New, Broader Bill In U.S. Congress
May 13, 2011 | By Kyle Orland

May 13, 2011 | By Kyle Orland

A defeated bill targeting websites accused of distributing copyrighted material has been reintroduced with a new name and broader powers to combat internet-based piracy.

The Preventing Real Online Threats to Economic Creativity and Theft of Intellectual Property (PROTECT IP) Act [PDF], introduced this week, builds on last year's Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA), which received game industry backing before being blocked from a floor vote by Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR).

The new bill would also allow the government to punish "rogue web sites" that distribute copyrighted material by preventing credit card payment processors, ad networks, search engines and internet service providers from working with them.

But the new bill also includes new provisions allowing for a "private right of action," allowing affected rights holders to bring cases against specific sites directly, without requiring the government to step in to prosecute.

Search engines and service providers are not subject to those private actions, but those sites are encouraged to voluntarily block sites they believe are infringing through a clause protecting them from damages if they do.

The new bill also refines the statutory definition of a site "dedicated to infringing activities," which some criticized for excess vagueness in COICA, and allows penalties to follow a site if it changes domain names.

"Just because it’s on the Internet doesn’t mean it’s free," said bill co-sponsor Orrin Hatch (D-UT) in a statement. "Stolen movies, music, and other products put many out of work. This is why protecting property rights is a critical imperative and is why we’ve come together in introducing this common-sense bill."

But the Electronic Frontier Foundation renewed its objection to the updated bill, stressing in particular that the provision encouraging search engines to self-censor "raises serious First Amendment concerns considering the lawful expression that may be hosted on the same domain."

Related Jobs

2K — Novato, California, United States

Level Architect
Cloud Imperium Games
Cloud Imperium Games — Santa Monica, California, United States

Art Outsourcing Manager
Respawn Entertainment
Respawn Entertainment — San Fernando Valley, California, United States

Senior Systems Designer
Petroglyph Games
Petroglyph Games — Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Senior Unity Artist


Jeffrey Crenshaw
profile image
What the hell is "Economic Creativity"? I don't see it defined in the bill, though it is used three times.

Andrew Hopper
profile image
Economic Creativity = ways to force people to pay for things that they could get for free with zero effort. Copying a file takes no time or effort yet provides a free working copy of the file, so "economic creativity" is coming up with ways to make that file uncopyable.

Robert Green
profile image
I would assume that 'Economic Creativity' simply means any creative work intended for sale. Or, more to the point, the right of the creators to charge for creative content.

William Barnes
profile image
Economic Creativity: The ability to control any and all content related to their field of media sales while ensuring profits and extravagant bonuses for the highest level of executives.

Craig Jensen
profile image
"Orrin Hatch (D-UT)"

:D Surely there are few Republicans more Republican than