| Harry Fields |
|
|
Be careful sirs, lest your franchise become the next Guitar Hero. The MW1 formula, while great, is getting a little worn out. Time for some innovation if you expect to keep those levels of engagement.
|
|
|
| Vin St John |
|
|
Isn't this widely publicized knowledge?
>"Call of Duty has more players who pay-to-play online than any Facebook game," Call of Duty require players to pay in order to play, and it is one of the most successful games/franchises at doing so (being a top-seller for several years). >"and our players pay more per player on average than any Facebook game." Call of Duty costs $60 to play. Average Facebook transactions don't even go that high (although there are plenty of games that throw in a hugely overpriced item just for fun). I'm not knocking Activision for stating their reasoning (it's solid) - just Gamasutra for highlighting this as though it's news. Of COURSE Call of Duty makes more money than Free to Play games. The promise of F2P games doesn't appeal to the top 1% of current AAA developers. The promise of F2P is appealing to the other 99% - the ones that aren't currently seeing a return on their investment in complex, 3D, boxed-product games. F2P has the *potential* to reach audience sizes of Very Large Number, and make money by monetizing some small fraction of Very Large Number. Call of Duty is one of the few console games that actually consistently is sold (for $60 a pop) to Very Large Number. Nintendo's more successful games also fall into this category (hence Nintendo wondering aloud why anyone would ever price a game at $1). To everyone else... lowering their price or going F2P may mean reaching that kind of audience size for the first time. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| Naeem Moose |
|
At this point its a choice between Skyrim and MW3 (due to close release dates). I have easily spent over 600 hours playing Morrowind/Oblivion/Fallout 3 + all DLC and expansions. I'd say every penny I spent on all three games was accounted for, and more.
While I know the average gamer will never finish his game or play less then 10 hours and move on. I still feel that Skyrim would be the better buy compared to MW3. If I want a fun FPS, I can always go back to the gold ol' days of MW and MW2 to some extent. If there is any need for a fun shooter, there is always Gears 3 and Battlefield 3. I just hope there are more people out there that wont just keep dropping $$$ for every Call of Duty that comes out from now till when this fad expires. |
|
|
| Lyon Medina |
|
|
Quick question Hirshberg, if you were to spend 60$ (and not even that after taxes) on a product wouldn't you be more engaged in said product?
This is where this analysis gets silly for Activision comparing Facebook games to console games. Engaged in Facebook games? Yes if your one of those people who spend money in the games you become engaged, but for those of us who never spent a dollar we could care less. This is an empty analysis that Activision is trying to flex it's muscles about how grand they are. Please just make us good games. And I don't mean for you to make another Call Of Duty:*insert title* game. Yeah last thing we need this upcoming year. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
| Joe McGinn |
|
What a bizarre press release - talk about comparing apples to oranges. More like comparing swiss cheee to chocolate.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||