| Eric Geer |
|
|
Wouldn't it be more proactive to reform the patent laws all together if you are looking for more innovation--If someone can do something better why not let them do so without having to deal with the law all together. Someone might have a good idea but another yet might have a great or incredible idea but won't follow through because impoving on an idea could also become infringing or more likely infringe entirely(generally smaller organizations or even individuals) and so they will avoid it all together.
To me the whole patent system is just a money maker for the less innovative--removing the system would keep people constantly thinking and improving- even more so to those that already have a hold on a great product. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
| Evan Combs |
|
|
The first step in fixing the patent system is to have the patent office be fully funded by the government. Get rid the patent office's need to fund itself, and there is no longer a need to pay $20,000 to $30,000 to file a patent. This also means they don't have the need to make everything patentable.
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
| Michael Joseph |
|
|
Most patents in software at least are not a product of lengthy R&D. A lot of it is just obvious as evident by software engineers time and time again independantly coming up with similar solutions to similar problems.
I think the one change I would have liked to see in the patent reform law is for the standard of what is / is not an obvious "invention" be determined by a jury of peers in the field and not based on the knowledge of the layman. I'm not sure how that would work logistically and how vulnerable to corruption it would be... but surely obviousness needs to be determined by people who actually know what they are talking about. Seems to me individual patent examiners have way too much power and the issue of corruption (bribes) already exists. |
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
| Paul Shirley |
|
One thing the change does is make creating valid prior art much easier. Just publish it before someone files a patent and the patent is dead, no 12 months window for costly litigation over who invented, litigation the patent filer will usually win simply because they prepared for the fight by keeping better records. And no US courts&companies blithely ignoring anything invented outside the US, that's now covered.
I have close to zero sympathy for those wishing to own software patents, if this makes it harder to lock up ideas, I say screw'em. If your invention is genuinely innovative enough to deserve a patent, taking time over filing won't be a problem, you won't be queue jumped and there's nothing to stop filing early anyway. If enough others can come up with the same idea that there's a race to patent then that patent is bogus and shouldn't exist - though the PTO will of course still screw up and award it. The games industry has done very well from freely sharing innovation, profiting off lead times without tying up the ideas forever. If your business is hurt by the changes, your business is what's wrong. Want to protect our industry? Publish quickly, publish often, publish where the PTO can't ignore it. |
|
|
| staff staffer |
|
“This is not a patent reform bill” Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) complained, despite other democrats praising the overhaul. “This is a big corporation patent giveaway that tramples on the right of small inventors.”
"patent reform" Senator Cantwell is right. Just because they call it “reform” doesn’t mean it is. The agents of banks, huge multinationals, and China are at it again trying to brain wash America. The patent bill is nothing less than another monumental federal giveaway for banks, huge multinationals, and China and an off shoring job killing nightmare for America. Even the leading patent expert in China has stated the bill will help them steal our inventions. Who are the supporters of this bill working for?? Patent reform is a fraud on America. This bill will not do what they claim it will. What it will do is help large multinational corporations maintain their monopolies by robbing and killing their small entity and startup competitors (so it will do exactly what the large multinationals paid for) and with them the jobs they would have created. The bill will make it harder and more expensive for small firms to get and enforce their patents. Without patents we cant get funded. Yet small entities create the lion's share of new jobs. According to recent studies by the Kauffman Foundation and economists at the U.S. Census Bureau, “startups aren’t everything when it comes to job growth. They’re the only thing.” This bill is a wholesale slaughter of US jobs. Those wishing to help fight this bill should contact us as below. Small entities and inventors have been given far too little voice on this bill when one considers that they rely far more heavily on the patent system than do large firms who can control their markets by their size alone. The smaller the firm, the more they rely on patents -especially startups and individual inventors. Congress tinkering with patent law while gagging inventors is like a surgeon operating before examining the patient. Please see http://truereform.piausa.org/default.html for a different/opposing view on patent reform. http://docs.piausa.org/ |
|
|
| Carson Gallo |
|
|
You know how I know The Patents system sucks...If The Guy who Patented The Theory of Relativity, you guessed it, Albert Einstein. Who worked as a Patton Clerk, didn't want to have anything to do with Pattening (Is that the past tense of Patten?) Policies after he left, then theres gotta be something wrong with the system.
Granted there was not as much Patton problems as we have today, and he was mainly a scientist, but still you would figure with him being a former employee, and he was a scientist, but with his fame, if he had a Theory for how The Patton system could work better, that would turn that theory into a law as fast as possible, which as of recently could be faster than the speed of light, ironically disproving his Theory of Relativity which I just mention, lol. |
|
|
| Craig Page |
|
I have just patented "ingenuity". Now pay up Steve! I see you've already invented a lot of things that violate my new patent.
|
|
|
More: Console/PC, Social/Online, Smartphone/Tablet, Indie, Exclusive, Business/Marketing