Gamasutra is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
July 16, 2019
arrowPress Releases







If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 

Why We Made Gridlock For OUYA

by David Thomson on 08/28/13 10:50:00 am   Featured Blogs

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.

 

We made Gridlock for three main reasons:

  1. It's an idea that had been bouncing around in my head for a long time, and I wanted to play it.
  2. We wanted to try out Unity as a tool.
  3. We wanted to practice making a game that needed a controller (or at least one that felt better with a controller).

Given OUYA and Unity seemed to play well together, it felt like a good combo to try out. The scope of the game is deliberately constrained - job one was to ship something, after all - so we threw out discrete waves pretty early on and made the game continuous. There's no power up system and no online leaderboards. The waves of abstract shapes intent on smashing your turrets are always the same. Making a single player game felt like a good complement to games like TowerFall and the newly-released Gentlemen!, which are designed as multiplayer experiences - something for people to do in between sessions of those games (which are both awesome, in case you haven't tried them out).

The game actually came together really well quite quickly (well, relatively - if we'd been familiar with Unity beforehand the development time might have been halved). Integration with OUYA's system for purchasing went smoothly (testing IAP on the system doesn't involve sandboxing like on iOS, it's kept very simple which I like).

For the purchasing system, you get to play as often as you like, but if you want your game to last more than 60 seconds, you'll have to pay. We made it so you can pay and continue the game you were playing, so if you're on a particularly good scoring run you won't lose the score you've racked up.

Will that model work? I have no idea - it doesn't feel unfair (sometimes I struggle to get 60 seconds into the onslaught), and the price feels about right (we went with $1.99 after some deliberation and examining prices for other games on the platform). We're keeping Gridlock exlusive on OUYA for now, and will report back regarding downloads and sales once we have some data. Our expectations are tempered by the fact we know it's a relatively small audience - in some ways, that's a strong appeal for us - and by the fact this was a learning project for us.

A lot has been written over the past few days and weeks about OUYA's ... miscalculations, shall we say. I'm not going to get into that here, but my experience so far is that the community around the platform is pretty coherent and supportive.

As I post this, I'm making the game live on the OUYA store (it's Thursday in New Zealand, after all). If you have an OUYA, please download and give it a try - would love to hear your feedback on it.

[Originally posted at: http://ludometrics.com/blog/why-we-made-gridlock-for-ouya/] 


Related Jobs

Square Enix Co., Ltd.
Square Enix Co., Ltd. — Tokyo, Japan
[07.15.19]

Experienced Game Developer
DMG Entertainment
DMG Entertainment — Beverly Hills, California, United States
[07.12.19]

Game Engineer
Sucker Punch Productions
Sucker Punch Productions — Bellevue, Washington, United States
[07.11.19]

QA Manager
Digital Extremes Ltd.
Digital Extremes Ltd. — London, Ontario, Canada
[07.08.19]

Senior Project Manager





Loading Comments

loader image