Gamasutra is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
November 29, 2021
arrowPress Releases
If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


 

Slicing up the Hyper Casual Pie

by MARTIN MACMILLAN on 11/08/21 11:59:00 am

The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra’s community.
The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company.

 

Slicing up the Hyper Casual Pie

Today’s hyper-casual market is driven by big numbers, thin margins and is very much a business of scale. Huge UA budgets ensure rapid escalation to the top of the charts, which is the key formula for success. The longevity of the game is not the objective. It’s a bit like a hit music factory - churning out the hits according to a formula and after a short space of time, they are largely forgotten about.

Hyper casual is a pretty binary business. If you are a hyper-casual studio, the huge UA budgets you need to scale a game are out of reach for most, so most choose to work with a publisher who has deep pockets to front the UA spend. Publishing of hyper-casual games has become hugely competitive with everyone competing for the best games, and studios looking for the best publishers to help them achieve success. And it all happens very fast. 

But in reality, many perfectly good games get abandoned which have decent revenue potential, but fall victim to how the entire hyper-casual market works, and end up on the scrap heap.

The bar is set high

Publishers have a high bar for success when considering which games to publish. They have a high hurdle rate for expected returns that drives their decision-making. They have finite resources, both financial and team, and need to allocate these resources according to where it’s going to yield the highest expected returns. 

When considering that hurdle rate, they have to price in the revenue share they must pass to the developer, let's say 50% of the revenues after costs of UA, (but for sure there are worse deals out there for hyper-casual studios). So the games that move the needle for the publishers need to be the games they can get into the top 10 on the app stores and stay up there for as long as possible.

But what if there were fewer people to get paid out when slicing up the pie? Could some of these games still achieve moderate success - perhaps not in the top ten, but certainly in the top 25?

If a developer were to be able to self-publish their game, could they achieve a measure of success that might not be up to the top games published by Voodoo or CrazyLabs, but nonetheless be considered a great success for the 4 person team that built it?

At Pollen VC we’ve seen a significant uptick in enquiries recently from studios looking to self publish their own hyper-casual games, and also take back games from publishers where they have been dropped/discarded.

Having learned how to approach UA buying and handle monetization, the financing of the UA can be easily handled by putting in place a revolving credit facility, as with short ROAS recovery timeframes it is easy to find the capital to reinvest quickly back into UA. For example, for a game with a 5 day ROAS Recovery period and $100k of marketing spend, it would be possible to spend more than $600k in the first 30 days through daily borrowing against their monetization revenues and reinvesting this back into UA. No credit lines from ad networks are required. And importantly there is no revenue share with a publisher, so more pie to go around for the studio!

Bringing it home...

If you feel your new game’s KPIs could make it a success, but can’t get the big publishers to bite. Or, if you are running up against apathy from your current publisher about continuing promotion on the game, you might want to think about going it alone and self-publishing. Of course, some of this will come down to whether you have the in-house capability for handling UA and monetization, and of course the capital to fund it. But at the heart of this argument is at the size of the pie, and reconsidering how it might be carved up.

Hyper Casual Studio? Try our Hyper Casual Velocity Calculator to see how much payment delays from the ad networks impact your growth potential.


Related Jobs

Square Enix Co., Ltd.
Square Enix Co., Ltd. — Tokyo, Japan
[11.28.21]

Experienced Game Developer
Insomniac Games
Insomniac Games — Remote - US, California, United States
[11.26.21]

Gameplay Programmer
Deep Silver Volition
Deep Silver Volition — Champaign, IL or Remote, Illinois, United States
[11.25.21]

Senior Technical Artist
4A Games
4A Games — Sliema, Malta
[11.25.21]

Lead AI Designer (Malta)





Loading Comments

loader image