Gamasutra is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
September 20, 2019
arrowPress Releases







If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:


AGDC: Property Rights In Online Games - Who Owns What?

AGDC: Property Rights In Online Games - Who Owns What? Exclusive

September 16, 2008 | By Brandon Sheffield




The end user license agreement, or EULA, is essentially what protects an online game from players but not necessarily the reverse.

In this panel, Raph Koster from Areae, Scott Hartsman of Ohai, game lawyer S. Gregory Boyd, author Erin Hoffman, and moderator Erik Bethke of GoPets discuss how to improve the EULA for all with significant conversational travel into real money trading (RMT) territory.

As part of the session, Koster revealed that the Metaplace EULA and terms of service (TOS) will be an exceptionally wide-ranging document including freedom of speech and IP ownership aspects.

Erik Bethke started thinking about EULAs during a talk he gave with some other folks at Stanford about virtual items. The talk covered the gap between what is owned by whom in virtual worlds and in general, nothing is owned by the player.

We have a lot of models now that dont fit within the existing EULAs, proposes Bethke. Why cant users just sell your own sword, in a game, if its described as theirs?

S. Gregory Boyd: Couple of reasons. The first is liability. If I want to cancel someones account, I dont want to have to pay the person the value of that sword. Second I dont want to compensate them or own up to anything when I nerf that sword for balancing reasons.

Scott Hartsman: Once you get into what brings people into some of these certain environments, back when Everquest introduced (item trading) I was the voice of anti-RMT in the office. We are still at the point online where some people come to this world to escape the real world, and the real world economy. When people come to escape, everybody wants to be winners. When were keeping the game to be as fun for everyone as possible, I think its preferred (not to have that).

Raph Koster: All of these things are ultimately just bits and bytes in the database. Ive often maintained that the best way to look at them is that way. So in that way, Im just fine with saying yeah, thats SOEs sword. Damn straight! Where it starts getting a little weirder is that those databases are all a log of a players experience. In any place but gaming, something like your quest log should be protected by privacy laws.

In a world where theres so much user contribution on so many levels, its not that I think everyone should own their sword, but I do think its getting very hazy.

Erin Hoffman: My main problem came down to two things. One came down to the intellectual honesty. If its not their sword, we shouldnt call it their sword.

The other problem Hoffman posed was commerce - large virtual worlds need commerce, and a restrictive EULA slows down those transactions. Players want to know, regardless of RMT, that they own their accounts.

Erik Bethke: In some ways I think WoW might be one of the biggest failures in this regard. Its such an entertaining product, but why does it have 10 million players, and not 50 million? Not 100 million? I wonder if it wouldnt be better if they had better property rights. Could we be making more money I we had a better EULA?

S. Gregory Boyd: When you look at any online game, they all have basically the same EULA, says Boyd, sort of a copy and paste from World of Warcrafts. It all comes down to this when you loosen the EULA, and give things like property rights, youre going to increase liability, and increase revenue costsand does it affect your average revenue per user? The jurys still out on that.

Raph Koster: There is one glaring example of having a more open EULA, and thats Second Life. The difference in user activity and contributions changed dramatically from the instant that they said users would own their IP.

To some degree you have to look at what the intent of the space is. If it is a pure entertainment space, then I tend to agree with you. Its like what is your pain threshold. Accidentally banning people leads to bad PR, which leads to more people leaving, depending on how bad it is. In a space about something else, I think the question is not as easy as that. If in second life the aim is encouraging entrepreneurship, the whole EULA needs to be different.

We (at Areae) actually have hanging on the wall that fostering entrepreneurship is one of the goals. We went into it saying if people go into it to build virtual worlds, theyre not going to know how to make a EULA. We have to give them a boilerplate, terms of service, and a EULA.

In Areaes Metaplace, companies can have freedom of expression, ownership, including earning money & running their own world, Areae wont spy on the company, and it can develop their own TOS if they want.

Users have the following rights: Freedom of speech & assembly, privacy. Rule of law and due process. Ownership of IP.

The responsibility of both creators and users is not to break the law, but Koster cautions that this basically means dont break any law, all over the world, since you never know where anyone will be logging in from.

Every one of these had to have an exception for minors, he says, and what you can display to minors, and every one had to have an exception for gambling.

Erik Bethke: So what about Creative Commons? Can we move to that?

S. Gregory Boyd: No. I wish we could! You could probably do a FAQ associated with your EULA, but the problem is scale. Now that we have hundreds of MUDs, and millions of players, we have a pretty good idea of the badness people can do. By the time Ive gotten to writing all the normal bad things people can do, Im on page 7. It takes a long time before you can even get to malpractice.

Erik Bethke: How does this scale worldwide?

S. Gregory Boyd: Its worse than you can imagine.

Raph Koster: If you really want to know whats the cutting edge of this, Id look at China. Because their government has stepped in and said I dont care what your EULA is, here are the new rules.

If were going to become the greatest form of entertainment and blah blah were going to have to look at Asia, where its already happening.


Related Jobs

HB Studios
HB Studios — Lunenburg/Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
[09.20.19]

Experienced Software Engineer
Sucker Punch Productions
Sucker Punch Productions — Bellevue, Washington, United States
[09.19.19]

UI Artist
Sucker Punch Productions
Sucker Punch Productions — Bellevue, Washington, United States
[09.19.19]

Senior Lighting Artist
Cold Iron Studios
Cold Iron Studios — San Jose, California, United States
[09.19.19]

Sr. Character Artist









Loading Comments

loader image