This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.
[Gamasutra is partnering with GameProducer.net,
a game production resource, for a series of Q&As named
'Producers of the Round Table'. The Round Table is a place for producers
who work in game industry to present their opinions in response to questions, and the first article in the series dealt with 'practical scheduling for games'.
In this installment, which deals
with programmer and artist communication, participants include Peter
O'Brien, Producer at Bizarre Creations,
Ben Gunstone, Production Director at Stainless Games,
Harvard Bonin, Senior Producer last at Electronic Arts, Frank Rogan,
Producer at Gas Powered Games and Amer Ajami, Producer at EALA.]
How do you get coders and artists to speak the same language?
Peter O'Brien: Get them in the same room and start a dialogue. This might be a meeting, it might be a seating plan that is permanent or flexible. It can even be an email - either way, get it started. Another way to make this happen is to use technical artists... you know, the rare breed that can write scripts, shaders and tools to help workflow. Most importantly, don't block the communication because you are a control freak.
There are many tactical things you can do to break down these walls:
Is it important to have some people in the team (technical artists, artistically inclined coders) who can translate?
Peter O'Brien: Technical artists can be an excellent addition to the team. They are your sweeper, able to focus on areas for any time the job requires. They can act as a conduit to executing critical workflow improvements and can be critical throughout the project if utilized.
I don't think the word "artistic"
is the correct term to use from my perspective. I know that I work with
creative coders and artists; the most creative individuals inspire,
or maybe just influence, one another to get the best solution. I'd say
a lot of the success I see in the studio is down to coders who think
creatively to empower either designer or artists. Vice-versa, the designers
and artists should respect the code by understanding how it works. Understanding
leads to further creative use or solutions to the system.
Artists versus programmers -- it's an old one, but it's a goody! To be honest,
it's an issue that can occur anywhere in a team, and it's always down
to poor communication. The communications can be improved by all the people you
list above: a technical artist, a designer and a producer. It can also
be handled by the Lead Art or Lead Code position.
If you have professionals of both trades, then there should be a certain amount of respect for each other in the team. Both sides need to understand the wants and needs of the other side. Again, with good communicatons and planning in place, this should be an easy task.
Or is that partly the job of the
designer -- how do the designer and producer fit in there?
Peter O'Brien: Does the producer actually have to be the conduit here to understand the different working styles? As stated earlier, designers and producers can get in the way. The best use of Designer and Producer is as catalyst and arbiter. Communicate the vision or establish a process. Put simply: Know what needs to be achieved and see it through.
Harvard Bonin: Generally, I believe, producers endeavor to hire talented, good artists and designers, et cetera. Our job is not to move the hand of the artist or designer, but rather, to make sure they know the direction that the company wants to go. In other words, provide a direction, point, and then trust in them. And then make sure they don't violate that direction. Yeah, yeah... that's philosophy.
At the same time, our job is to guide.
They are being paid for a job... and so are we. We try to understand
the objective and then help people achieve that. We are no good in our
job without fantastic people to help us all get there.