Gamasutra is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them. Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
September 24, 2020
arrowPress Releases

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

Analysis: The Status (Quo) Effect

Analysis: The Status (Quo) Effect Exclusive

April 12, 2010 | By Jamie Madigan

[Psychologist and gamer Jamie Madigan looks at the psychological ramifications of taking advantage of people's tendency to keep with the status quo - particularly with regard to sign-up options for media and how they could be applied to games.]

Many of us have been surprised in spite of ourselves when one day we looked up and realized that we've been paying for a MMO like World of Warcraft when we haven't logged on for months.

Or maybe we're reading our e-mail and we get a cheerful note from Microsoft saying that our Xbox Live Gold account has automatically renewed and the charge applied to our credit card. And still we don't do anything about it. Why not?

A Brief Example Involving Adult Stuff

Before I explain, consider this graph, showing the participation rates between two groups of in a 401(k) savings plan. (For those who don't know, a 401(k) plan lets employees automatically sock away part of each paycheck for retirement. They offer lots of benefits and participating in them is generally a smart thing to do if you don't want to keel over of old age on the job.)


Can you guess as to why only 49% of people in Group A decided to save for retirement while a comparatively larger 86% of Group B members decided to save? Maybe Group B is full of MBAs, economists, or self-aware computers who are hyperrational relative to the drunken chimps in Group A? Nope. Maybe Group A is full of young whippersnappers unconcerned with retirement while Group B is comprised of old geezers? A better guess, but still incorrect.

These groups were actual subjects in a 2001 study by two economists interested in what happened when a tiny but important change was made simple paperwork. The only difference between the groups was that the paperwork for Group A required new hires to actively sign up for the savings plan, while the paperwork for Group B automatically enrolled them into the savings plan unless they overrode that decision.

In other words, people tended to go with the default choice and much like those of us perpetually paying for World of Warcraft without playing it, the suckers in Group A saved less because they couldn't be bothered to uncheck one box on one form. Stupid box.

The Status Quo Effect

But don't blame the box. Psychologists have a term for this reluctance to change from our previous or default decisions: "the status quo effect." Most television programmers use it to glide you from one show to the next, using an established hit with a strong viewership to build an audience for whatever comes after it.

It's even gotten to the point where you move seamlessly from the end of one show to a quick intro to the next without even pausing for a commercial break. Because once they start, many people will continue to watch even though switching to something else is trivially easy.

This is, of course, the same reason why gaming companies prefer that you sign up for an automatically renewing service instead of using prepaid subscription or point cards. It's also the reason that services like Netflix and GameFly offer "Free Trials" that will roll into paid subscriptions if you don't actively cancel. They even spin it as a benefit: "If you are enjoying Netflix, do nothing and your membership will automatically continue..."

But it's also important to be aware of the fact that the default choices you're presented with when signing up for a new service have much the same effect as the status quo bias. Let's stick with GameFly and consider this screenshot from the sign-up process:


Notice which option is checked by default: the most expensive one. That's not by accident. HTML technology is sufficiently advanced so that they could easily have had no plan chosen by default and could instead require you to make your choice in order to proceed. Instead, they're taking advantage of the status quo effect and probably getting more people for the $12.95 plan.

Hey, look, Netflix does the same thing!


In fact, you can look at just about ANY sign-up form on the Internet and you'd see this same thing. Now you know why.

Similarly, "Opt out" options are popular among marketers because many people don't bother with the almost effortless task of unchecking some boxes so that they don't receive spam or avoid installing some obnoxious toolbar in their web browser.

When The Status Quo is the Most ...Quo

But you guys, wait! The status quo effect only gets more potent when the task you're faced with is more difficult or cognitively demanding. In a recent article for Psychology Today, psychologist Kelly McGonicgal discusses some research that addresses the neuroscience of how this all works.

Subjects in this study were asked to act as tennis referees for difficult calls, but for each trial one of the two possible calls (in or out of bounds) was randomly made the default choice. You can probably head me off at the pass and figure out that people tended to stick with the randomly assigned default choice, even more so when the call was difficult.

And according to McGonigal, even considering going against a default choice seemed to increase the activity in the prefrontal cortex (an area associated with decision-making) and increased exchanges between that area and the subthalamic nucleus, a chunk of gray matter associated with motivated behavior.

In other words, evaluating something besides a default options literally requires more mental energy than just going with the default option, and when you complicate things with lots of small print or numbers like in the Netflix screenshot above, it gets even more mentally taxing.

Wielding the Status Quo for Good

The status quo effect can work to our benefit, though --just look at the 401(k) savings example above. Many games feature built-in tutorials, tooltips, or other pointers for novice players. Often these assists can be turned off, but they are almost always "on" by default because even if you make players aware of them, most would probably not bother turning them on if they were off by default.

For example, the Guitar Hero and Rock Band games DON'T present tutorials to new players by default. This always seemed weird to me, and I swear I made it through most of the first Guitar Hero without ever knowing about hammer-ons and pull-offs because I had skipped the tutorial.

So beneficial situations aside, how do you guard against the status quo effect when you don't want it unduly influencing your behavior? For starters you can use prepaid subscription cards instead of automatically renewing subscriptions. I renew my Xbox Live Gold membership each year by using such a card, which has the added benefit of letting me buy the cards when they're on sale and hold on to them until needed. Heck, even Zynga of Farmville fame is selling prepaid game cards now.

Beyond prepaid cards and canceling free trials before they morph into a paid subscription like a Zerg larvae, just make sure you take the time to look carefully at default options the next time you're filling something out or agreeing to a terms of service. Especially when it's a cognitively demanding or confusing task, as that's when you're most likely to succumb to the status quo effect. Consider: are those default choices what's best for you? SPOILER ALERT: no, probably not.


Madrian, B. & Shea, D. (2001). The Power of Suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) Participation and Savings Behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 4, 1149-1187.

Thaler, R. & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York, NY: Penguin Books.

[Jamie Madigan, Ph.D. is a psychologist and gamer who explores why players and developers do what they do by studying the overlap between psychology and video games at The Psychology of Games website. He can be reached at [email protected]]

Related Jobs

Square Enix Co., Ltd.
Square Enix Co., Ltd. — Tokyo, Japan

Experienced Game Developer
Sony PlayStation
Sony PlayStation — Bend, Oregon, United States

Lead FX Artist
Airship Syndicate
Airship Syndicate — Austin, Texas, United States

Mid to Senior Worldbuilder - Unreal Engine
Airship Syndicate
Airship Syndicate — Austin, Texas, United States

Senior VFX Artist

Loading Comments

loader image