[In this opinion piece -- originally printed in the August 2009 issue of Game Developer magazine in shorter form -- editor-in-chief Brandon Sheffield considers the barriers to immersion of the increasingly ubiquitous first-person perspective in video games.]
Talking with our previous magazine art director recently, I recalled something Iíd forgotten: First-person games can be quite intimidating.
We tend to accept first-person as a de facto viewpoint for several popular genres today, and it also saves developers from having to develop a camera system independent of the playerís control. But it is rather daunting, and has a high learning curve for those who havenít already experienced many first-person games.
The art director in question is a more casual player, and to her, first-person games seem disorienting and conceptually difficult. Talking about this reminded me of my first FPS experience, Wolfenstein 3D for the Atari Jaguar.
Not having been able to afford a computer growing up, this was my first interaction (in perhaps '97 or '98) with a proper FPS. I tried playing the game for about an hour, and came away dizzy and unable to read, because my eyes were jumping around on the page.
This experience had me pretty convinced that first-person games werenít for me, all the way until Halo 2 hit and someone convinced me to give it another shot. Perhaps thatís not a good thing for an editor of Game Developer to admit, but itís true.
I have since learned the power of the first-person viewpoint in terms of what you can show on screen, and the interactions that become possible. But I spoke with my fellow editors, and several had recollections of difficulty penetrating that first-person wall. The reason for that is likely that we are used to seeing games and movies play out before us in a third-person view. Having an avatar gives us a strong frame of reference, and allows us to better navigate the world. If I see a little running guy, and I try to make him jump, I can gauge that distance.
If I have to jump in first-person mode, where are my feet? Are they below the camera directly? How far can I jump, when everything feels like itís based on my perspective? If I look up a bit, the platform in front of me looks different than it did before. A 14-year-old boy will take the time to figure this out, and will wind up having an excellent experience. An older or more casual user will likely be much more daunted, and less inclined to even pick up such a title.
The Immersion Question
Are first-person games inherently more immersive? A lot of developers seem to presume that they are, but letís take a second look. Consider the last time you felt like you actually were the character in a game you played. Iíd be willing to guess that most people will say ďnever.Ē We donít generally take on the role of the character weíre playing, except as children in imaginary play.
What most of us do is identify with the character -- and how can you identify with a character you canít see, a character who usually doesnít even talk or have any opinions about the horrible things going on around him? This goes back to the ďsilent heroĒ dilemma that has existed ever since role-playing made its way into the electronic world, notoriously perpetuated by the Japanese console RPG.
Almost all first-person games have this sort of silent character, one whose only interaction with others is usually taking orders until they turn their backs, and then just shooting and collecting things. That doesnít seem inherently immersive to me. It can be, but it isnít necessarily, as is often assumed. Western RPGs like Fallout 3 (or earlier games like Ultima IV) do a somewhat better job by at least allowing the player to make some dialog choices -- but still, the character isnít you.
What makes a game immersive or otherwise is not the viewpoint, of course; itís the situations, external characters, and tasks that get you involved. One of the characters Iíve identified most with is the boy from Ico, and he doesnít even speak a real language. The oppressive environments and his seeming innocence simply made him a sympathetic character.
Itís difficult to empathize or identify with a camera or floating gun. I can empathize with De Niroís character in Once Upon a Time in America, even though I donít agree with what he does, simply because his world is so well-realized, and I can see how he reacts to events. In first-person games, there is no reaction on the part of the character, and it becomes difficult to feel anything about him or her.
First-person games are incredibly important to the industry, and have moved many genres forward in significant ways. The viewpoint is doubtless here to stay, and I want to emphasize that I am actually a fan of the concept. But I do think itís worth taking a step back. I feel that as an industry weíve come to our own conclusion that first-person games are inherently intuitive and more immersive, simply by virtue of their camera position, and in spite of the problems they bring up.
I would submit that just because weíve gotten used to this style of game doesnít mean everyone has. Itís important to realize that making a first-person game almost necessarily means making a game for the dedicated gamer.
Break Down the Wall
Innovations on the interface side could help lower the casual block, perhaps through the Wii, Project Natal, or the PS3ís new motion controller. Regardless, it will take a lot of work and concerted effort to penetrate the casual audience with a first-person camera. The question is whether we even need to, when there are so many camera systems that games have yet to fully explore.
After this editorial went up in the magazine, a couple people mailed me to say that they feel I have too closely tied character identification with immersion, and thatís not my intention. Thatís just an example, coupled with the control barrier, that bars the first person viewpoint from being inherently more immersive. Third person cameras that get caught in walls and show a complete lack of knowledge of cinematography can be just as confusing.
But I do feel that there is a thinking among many developers that if a game is first-person, the player will automatically feel as though they are in the game themselves. I submit that there is a lot of work to be done before that is true.