Our Properties: Gamasutra GameCareerGuide IndieGames Indie Royale GDC IGF Game Developer Magazine GAO
My Message close
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
What Nintendo's 2011 sales mean for Wii U, third parties
 
DICE 2012: Culture, pride lead to success at Skyrim maker Bethesda [3]
 
DICE 2012: Is the publishing model broken? [14]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
2K Marin
FX Artist - XCOM
 
Visual Concepts
Software Engineer, VC China (Shanghai)
 
Visual Concepts
Senior Producer, VC China (Shanghai)
 
2K Marin
Senior Rendering Programmer
 
2K Marin
Level Designer
 
Visceral Games Redwood Shores
Sr. Gameplay Engineer-Visceral Games
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
arrow Postmortem: CyberConnect 2's Solatorobo: Red the Hunter
 
arrow Jerked Around by the Magic Circle - Clearing the Air Ten Years Later [32]
 
arrow Building the World of Reckoning [4]
 
arrow SPONSORED FEATURE: TwitchTV - How to Build Community Around Your Game in 2012 [13]
 
arrow Happy Action, Happy Developer: Tim Schafer on Reimagining Double Fine [9]
 
arrow Building an iOS Hit: Phase 1 [11]
 
arrow Postmortem: Appy Entertainment's SpellCraft School of Magic [5]
 
arrow Talking Copycats with Zynga's Design Chief [82]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
February 9, 2012
 
The Devil Is in the Details of Action RPGs - Part One: The Logistics of Loot [2]
 
Xbox LIVE Indie Games at it Again
 
Merging Waterfall and SCRUM [3]
 
Business Post Mortem: Wolf Toss: Pre-launch Planning & Blended CAC
 
Minmaxing - Is turn-based fun anymore? [53]
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief/News Director:
Kris Graft
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Frank Cifaldi, Tom Curtis, Mike Rose, Eric Caoili, Kris Graft
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
 
Comment Guidelines
Sponsor
Features
  Postmortem: Minds Eye's Sheep
by Andrew Evans [Game Design, Postmortem]
Post A Comment Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
April 13, 2001
 

(Editor's Note: It is not the policy of Gamasutra to remove features unless they contain untrue or inaccurate statements. While Andy Evans' Sheep Postmortem contained no factual errors, it has been removed at the request of the author. Andy explains his decision in the following letter.)

I, Andy Evans (the author) have asked for the Sheep Postmortem to be removed.


This document was posted for games makers to learn from our mistakes on a single project, not for people to judge the entire company. This Postmortem deals with the one and only project from Minds Eyes that went over budget or deadline.

My glib remark "not everything went wrong: O.K. it did" was meant to be humorous. For every one thing that went wrong, ten things went right. You should learn from your own (and our) mistakes. That is why I listed the mistakes in such detail and glossed over the successes.

Sheep is in the past. Both Minds Eye and I have moved on. The document was in no way intended to reflect on any other project that was running concurrently with, or since, Sheep.
As stated in the document, until the project for which I was the producer started, Minds Eye had a prefect record for delivery, quality and budget. It may be of interest to note that the three other projects running concurrently with Sheep all finished on time, on budget, and to the client's satisfaction and Minds Eye have not missed since.

I would like it to be known that Minds Eye have an excellent crew. I would like it to be known that Sheep was originally a "little" game for us to cut our teeth on. It caught the imagination of everyone who saw it. It became big. I made the statement that new people should not be put in mission critical positions. When Sheep was small it was not a mission critical game. The use of new people was valid.

The document in no way reflects the current situation at Minds Eye.

An apology: Also note that through a bad choice in phrasing I may have inadvertently slandered our publishers. It may have looked like I accused them of not paying the final balance on the game. This is not true and I take full responsibility for the error and I apologize completely and unreservedly for any offense I have caused. Minds Eye was paid in full and as per the game contract.


I say again. LEARN - DO NOT JUDGE.

________________________________________________________

 
Article Start Page of
 
Comments


none
 
Comment:
 




UBM Techweb
Game Network
Game Developers Conference | GDC Europe | GDC Online | GDC China | Gamasutra | Game Developer Magazine | Game Advertising Online
Game Career Guide | Independent Games Festival | Indie Royale | IndieGames

Other UBM TechWeb Networks
Business Technology | Business Technology Events | Telecommunications & Communications Providers

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Copyright © UBM TechWeb, All Rights Reserved.