Contents
Still Alive: Kim Swift And Erik Wolpaw Talk Portal
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Video Game Watchdog National Institute On Media And The Family Shutting Down [10]
 
Modern Warfare 2 Infinity Ward's 'Most Successful PC Version' Yet [12]
 
New Tech, Design Details Of Project Natal To Emerge At Gamefest In February
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Character Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
3D Environment Artist
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Network Programmer
 
Sucker Punch Productions
Texture Artist
 
Sony Online Entertainment
Brand Manager
 
Monolith Productions
Sr. Software Engineer, Engine - Monolith Productions - #113767
 
Crystal Dynamics
Sr. Level Designer
 
Gargantuan Studios
Lead World Designer
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
arrow Upping The Craft: Susan O'Connor On Games Writing [6]
 
arrow Small Developers: Minimizing Risks in Large Productions - Part II [6]
 
arrow iPhone Piracy: The Inside Story [48]
 
arrow And Yet It Grows: Analyzing the Size and Growth of the European Game Market [5]
 
arrow NPD: Behind the Numbers, October 2009 [13]
 
arrow Reflecting On Uncharted 2: How They Did It [5]
 
arrow Sponsored Feature: Rasterization on Larrabee -- Adaptive Rasterization Helps Boost Efficiency
 
arrow Postmortem: Wadjet Eye's The Blackwell Convergence [2]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
November 22, 2009
 
Accepting the Inherent Value of Games
 
Planckogenesis, Part II: Song Structure & Gravy Train [1]
 
Designing Games Is About Matching Personalities [1]
spacer
About
spacer News Director:
Leigh Alexander
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Editor At Large:
Chris Remo
Advertising:
John 'Malik' Watson
Recruitment/Education:
Gina Gross
 
Features
  Still Alive: Kim Swift And Erik Wolpaw Talk Portal
by Brandon Sheffield
1 comments
Share RSS
 
 
March 25, 2008 Article Start Previous Page 7 of 8 Next
 

Do the teams generally stay as they are, or is there flow between them?

KS: They usually shuffle around right after a project ships. People want to go do something else for a little while, and some people want to try something new. There definitely is an ebb and flow to things.

Advertisement

EW: Yeah. Generally, you work on what you're interested in working on, and by the end of the project, a lot of times, everybody comes together. We pull people in at the very end -- some of the super-high level artists give us an art pass through Portal. There's always people jumping on at the end, but yeah, people sort of shuffle around and work on what they're interested in.

How did the idea for the developer's commentary come about?

KS: Well, that was something that was done in Lost Coast.

EW: I don't know who thought it up, but Gabe maybe decided to put it in there. It was popular in Lost Coast, so we've done it in every product since then. I'm assuming it will just keep going.

KS: Yeah, we've gotten lots of positive feedback about putting in developer commentary, so I can't imagine we'd stop.

EW: Yeah, I don't think we're going to stop. Hopefully it'll get better. There's a lot of features we'd like to add, sort of interactive visual displays and stuff that'll actually show you what levels looked like earlier.

Concept art and things?

EW: Yeah.

I think it's pretty good, not just as something for people who are interested, but similar to director's commentary for movies, kind of. Have you gotten any feedback from aspiring developers?

KS: Yeah, we've gotten a few e-mails from people saying that the process was really interesting and they learned quite a few things.

EW: Yeah, and one of the goals of it is that even though it's commentary, to try and make it a little bit focused. Instead of having four of us sit in a room and ramble about what we think about the game, we try and actually make each little commentary node have something to say -- something interesting or some point to make about the game or the design.

KS: It's actually quite a good postmortem for us, too, where we can sit around and try and reminisce about "Well, I've worked in this area."

EW: Well, it's not actually a postmortem, because it's coming together in the crazy last four weeks before we ship.

KS: Well, we do have to think about it, though. (laughs)

It's maybe an end-mortem. The only design weirdness -- and I don't know if it's design or implementation or what -- that I found was whenever I would die in the water, I wouldn't know what was going on. Sometimes the portal gun would be lying there, and I could look around and stuff, but I couldn't move and wasn't quite dead yet.

KS: Yeah, part of that came about because... we used to have ragdolls, so whenever you would die, your player would ragdoll, so you could obviously tell you were dead.

It's something we took out of the game at the last minute, because our ragdoll wasn't acting properly, and would pose in odd positions and made us uncomfortable, so we took it out, because we didn't like how it was looking. We didn't get a chance to put in a really good signifier that you were dead.

Also, I didn't know what I could do, because I had some movement ability still.

KS: Well, we wanted you to be able to look around while you were dead, to see what killed you. In some cases, the fact that you've got a free mouselook bound to where your corpse is really nice, especially if you got hit by an energy ball. We tried to focus the camera a bit on the energy ball, and it didn't work out so well.

It took me a while to realize I had to do something if I wanted to be alive again, unless I wanted to wait more.

KS: That's actually a Half-Life convention, that you have to click or press a key to come forward. It's something we had too.

That was something I should've known already!

EW: No, again, it's playtesting. We failed you.

KS: It's our fault. (laughs)

 

 
Article Start Previous Page 7 of 8 Next
 
Comments

David Deeble
profile image
I think Portal's two-hour playtime was a great decision in the end, even though at the time I was a little disappointed that it was all over so quickly. The point where the game ends is a really natural conclusion, any longer and I think some of the excitment and drive would have been lost. It works really well as a bite-size story.
I agree with the comments about game-length, or at least how concentrated an effort it is these days to actually see a game through to its conclusion. I guess episodic content is going some ways to addressing this point.


none
 
Comment:
 


Submit Comment