Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
Gamasutra's Top 12 Games of the Decade
View All     RSS
October 22, 2014
arrowPress Releases
October 22, 2014
PR Newswire
View All

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

Gamasutra's Top 12 Games of the Decade

December 30, 2009 Article Start Previous Page 8 of 8

1. World of Warcraft (PC, 2004)

Five years after its initial release, Blizzard's massively multiplayer online role-playing game World of Warcraft has attracted as many as 11 million monthly subscribers, according to the last public count, all of whom are captivated by the expansive world of Azeroth.

Mario Garcia, Mercury Steam: "Reasons? Effectiveness of his design, huge infrastructure, big money spent, number of players, net hours of play, mixed demographics, social influence. Also, for me raised serious questions about the responsibility of developers in how his games affect people's life and the ethics of using game design technics to keep players spending time in the game. I feel this is going to be a big deal in the coming decades."

Justin Wingard, Timegate Studios: "It proved that the MMO market didn't have to be limited to the hardcore gamers. The game has completely changed the standards and expectations for a MMORPG and has considerably changed our perception of an MMO.

"This, of course, says nothing for the fact that it has made more money than any other game this decade by an enormous margin and continues to be absurdly profitable for Activision / Blizzard."

Christopher Plummer: "This is not even a fair competition. World of Warcraft has been around for 5 of the last 10 years and continues to draw more and more fans to it. It has a wide variety of gameplay within it from traditional RPG elements, to co-op elements, to Competitive deathmatch/sporting elements.

"The design elements have been ripped off by almost every game created in the last couple of years. I can't play this game anymore for a variety of reasons, but in its original two years it was the greatest game ever. The expansions were good too, but they were not the original. I don't think we'll see something that good in a long time."

Joe Woynillowicz: "Blizzard came out with an extremely polished MMO and have brought the genre into the mainstream of gaming. It has led the genre for five years now and does not look like it will be giving up that lead anytime soon, and they are a heavy influence on the current and next generation of MMO games."

Carl Chavez: "It brought a lot of new players into the PC platform, made up a sizable percentage of revenue for the game industry over the past few years, proved subscription-based gaming was profitable, brought forward social gaming to the masses (more than Everquest, DaoC, and other MMOs), permeated pop culture so much that even Mr. T. is co-branding with it, influenced game design (who doesn't play Dragon Age: Origins and think of WoW?) and indirectly caused its players to try out other MMOs on both PCs and consoles, which further affected the industry.

"I don't even like WoW! However, I can see how big its impact has been. People who make a big deal about Modern Warfare 2's first-month sales seem to forget that WoW probably makes the same amount of cash from subscriptions every few months, and with much less development cost."

Matt Allmer: "As developers, we envy those who are a part of it. As gamers, we are fully engaged in its addictive gameplay. As critics, we marvel at its level of polish, game progression and design aesthetics. As industry experts we still monitor its shelf life and ever-growing list of achievements.

"It crosses gender boundaries, age boundaries, geographic boundaries and sets the bar for online social interaction. It is a symbol of popular culture. It is widely popular without selling out to cheap promotional tricks or marketing bulls#@!. It is a clear milestone in the history this young medium and has even claimed hours of playtime from the president of the United States.

"Above all else, it is the only game my dad has enlisted me to return to, and play again. From where I stand, nothing says 'Game of the Decade' more than that."

David Delanty: "It doesn't take a WoW player to understand the sheer scope of the game's influence. It is one of the few games in history to dramatically change the face of society itself, creating a subset of gamers so massive they might as well be considered their own separate nationality.

"The gargantuan user base isn't the only striking feature of WoW, but a comparatively large game world that is as dynamic as it is deep. WoW set the bar for online gaming, and created a series of goals and objectives for the player that many other titles seek to duplicate, and in doing so, have also redefined the way in which game designers tackle their online Multiplayer features.

"No longer is it good enough to get the highest kill count in a shooter, or overwhelm an opposing general in a strategy game. Multiplayer needs to implement systems of leveling, perks, and prestige that were originally reserved strictly for the MMO crowd, but were executed so seamlessly in WoW that its design is now a standard example for contemporary AAA titles.

"World of Warcraft can be attributed to many things, not all of them benevolent. The game is so in-depth, gamers frequently forget to take care of themselves. There isn't a lot of media out there (outside of illegal substance abuse) where a participant can be so into their fix that they starve to death.

"World of Warcraft has been the crutch for many divorces, violent crime, Online scammers, and morbid obesity. I've seen several classmates fail out of college to supplement their WoW addiction, and while one would expect a 'lesson learned' scenario, the truth is, WoW has such a magnetic hook the junkies keep coming back for more. Good, bad, or ugly, World of Warcraft revolutionized the online gaming platform so dramatically it would easily be considered one of the most defining titles of the 2000's."

Eric Hardman: "It is the biggest game changer of the decade. It's not necessarily the best game, nor my personal favorite, but it is certainly the one by which I will remember the aughts. It's cultural, economic, and industry impact are unsurpassed, and it's the only single game to have that kind of clout, across platforms and genres.

"Along those lines, a case could be made for the Wii, but which single game? Wii Sports? Hardly. This isn't an award for controllers. XBLA could be considered a contender, due to the proliferation of indie and downloadable content -- certainly a game changer and decade-long theme. But which single game? A personal note here, is that my favorite games of the decade were from the Total War series, with Guild Wars a close second. But Game of the Decade? It's WoW."

Michael Kelly: "In terms of a game that really was a mark for the 2000s, there's really nothing bigger than World of Warcraft. Massive popularity (to the point of being a wider cultural phenomenon), excellent game design that is still being polished, and really the final culmination of the way that MMOs have been developing since Everquest.

"And the gameplay innovations used in WoW have affected even offline games (eg. Dragon Age) Not to say something new might arise, but WoW really seems like the most fully realized MMO to ever come along."

Kevin Lim: "In terms of significant cultural impact, nothing can beat World of Warcraft. No one can deny that anyone who has a computer(which is by now almost everyone in the States) has at least heard of this game. Possibly amongst the single most-played games (barring games that are bundled with the computer such as solitaire and the such), it has had a serious influence and changed the MMORPG scene for better or worse."

John Hay: "WoW managed to become the identity for an entire genre against which all other MMOs are compared. It also penetrated the main stream lexicon in a way no other game has done perhaps since Quake. As a result, the entire games industry has benefitted from the non-gamers it has attracted."

Pablo Dopico: "I don't think it even needs to be justified. This has revolutionized the way people play videogames. It's the most successful videogame of the decade, and it consolidated subscription-based role playing gaming on persistent universes. You might love it or hate it, but WoW has changed the world of computer entertainment software, it's accessible to everyone, and it offers an engaging, long-lasting, multi-faceted appeal.

"Additionally, it has been key to keeping the PC alive as a commercially viable gaming platform, key to the incorporation of women in PC gaming, and key to consolidate Blizzard (and now Activision / Blizzard) as one of the major actors in the industry. But of course, everyone knows that, because WoW is the most successful game of the decade, without a single trace of a doubt."

Article Start Previous Page 8 of 8

Related Jobs

DeNA Studios Canada
DeNA Studios Canada — Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Analytical Game Designer
University of Texas at Dallas
University of Texas at Dallas — Richardson, Texas, United States

Assistant/Associate Prof of Game Studies
Avalanche Studios
Avalanche Studios — New York, New York, United States

UI Artist/Designer
Bohemia Interactive Simulations
Bohemia Interactive Simulations — ORLANDO, Florida, United States

Game Designer


Anthony Charles
profile image
World of Warcraft has had as large of a social and cultural impact as any game, but I believe it lacks in innovation. It's basically a better executed Everquest done for a mainstream audience.

Khin Boon Chang
profile image
No Warcraft III? The birth place for tower defense and dota. It still have a large community playing since 2002. Still very playable after 8 years and couldn't appear on this list? I believe just Dota player alone have more audience that most game listed here. And it lay the foundation for WOW. I feel unjust for Warcraft III.

Hanley Leung
profile image
guitar hero hello?

Jonathon Walsh
profile image
@Khin Actually both forms of games existed previously in Starcraft. It was simply WC3 that really expanded on the game types and opened up new possibilities. That said WC3 as an standalone RTS is quite lackluster. There are a lot of... questionable... design decisions in my opinion. The biggest flaw being that WC3 has one of the biggest slippery slopes of any RTS. The loss of a single unit in WC3 is punished twice (you give up xp to the enemy in addition to the lost unit) and the loss of map position is punished four ways (lose control over expansions, neutral creeps, neutral shops, and loss of map position which is significant in and of itself).

DotA is quite popular and would have made a good honorable mention but its flaws and limitations make it unworthy of a GotD spot in my opinion.

That said I like this list a lot. The only game I'm iffy about (HL2) is also one of my favorite games. I love HL2 but I didn't find its impact to be as significant as the rest of the amazing list. That and HL1 is the better entry in the series to me (not that it would be on this list either since it released in '98).

Nicholas McKay
profile image
@Anthony: By that standard Halo probably shouldn't be on this list either. But cultural impact shouldn't be understated. There are very few games that make a significant impact on the larger society (and not just our little community), and even fewer that can claim to make as big of an impact as WoW. Every game on this list can trace its mechanics to a predecessor.

Besides, the way that Blizzard has handled the evolution of WoW, and indeed how they handled stoking the fires to increase popularity... I think if you can't call that innovative you have to at least call it genius. I think, because it's 5 years old now and because it's been so popular for so long, we forget just how hard it is to get that popular or how hard it is to actually make a game that can be so immersive and so much fun.

Sjors Jansen
profile image
So to get to be popular is to be good? In that case I would agree with Hanley Leung.

But I don't :)

Joshua Sterns
profile image
I love the list. Pretty much what I thought it would be.

Can't help but agree about WoW. It was the only game I played almost exclusively for 2.5 years. Nothing has held my attention, or provided so many hours of fun entertainment.

Dean Rymer
profile image
No Guitar Hero? The game that started a new era of peripheral gaming.

No God of War? The game that has been one of the most mimicked for its tone and feel.

No Resident Evil 4? The game that popularized the "2nd person" perspective and set a new standard for enemy behavior and environment interaction.

No Shenmue? The game that gave us quick-time-events.

How about Halo 2? The game that gave us the best online lobby. So good that now 360 dashboard itself has its own lobby system.

What about Geometry Wars? A game that showed retro mechanics and downloadable titles on console can be a huge success.

[User Banned]
profile image
This user violated Gamasutra’s Comment Guidelines and has been banned.

John Gordon
profile image
I think the main "innovation" of WoW for MMO's is not what it added, but what it took away. Namely it took away most of the frustration. MMO's have always had really fun gameplay elements: building up a character, exploring a huge world, playing with friends and making new ones, etc.... However previous MMO's also had a lot of frustrating elements: Grinding, corpse runs, looking for a group, etc.... World of Warcraft found a way to take the frustration away from all of these things. Grinding is more fun because there are tons of quests. Corpse runs are now just a short run to your corpse to get back in the game. Looking for a group is not frustrating, because you can play solo. I think overall they just did everything possible to remove frustration, and when they removed all of the crap a really fun game was what remained.

Luis Guimaraes
profile image
Shadow of The Colosus!! Hell, yeah!

Hey wait, WoW?

EDIT: Smells like a really big push into MMOs for the next decade, brandwidth and lag issues are still what keeps MMOs to evolve.

Bart Stewart
profile image
I have no serious arguments with this list. Naturally, there are still some comments I might make....

1. Other platforms haven't been out as long, but it's still the case that more of the "Games of the Decade" were made for the PC than any other platform. It's also worth noting that the top three GotD (WoW, Deus Ex, HL2) nominees were all PC games.

Counting up the platforms on which each GotD nominee was originally released:

PC: 5

PS/PS2/PS3: 3

Xbox/360: 3

Wii: 2

GameCube: 1

And factoring in the original platforms for the honorable mentions:

PC: 12

PS/PS2/PS3: 12

Xbox/360: 9

Wii: 2

GameCube: 2

So is there any meaning in this information?

2. No "Fallout 3" (2008)? As a fairly recent game it may be too young to merit "Game of the Decade" status. Even so, given its breadth of content, highly memorable atmosphere, superb writing, highly polished DLC model, and fidelity to an ongoing franchise, I'm surprised not to see it receive even an honorable mention.

3. No "Bejeweled" (2001)? This may be the only casual game that's come close to matching the popularity of Solitaire among people who don't consider themselves "video game players." As an exemplar of simple casual games that have exploded onto multiple platforms, I'm also surprised not to see this game make Gamasutra's GotD list.

4. No "RuneScape" (2001)? Considering this game's popularity (it made the Top Ten Internet Searches of 2009 list, and was the only computer game to do so), as well as its technical architecture (it's browser-based, opening it up to potentially many more players than a platform-specific game), is there something going on here that isn't being picked up on by Gamasutra readers?

5. I can't help but be fascinated by the number of commenters for World of Warcraft who added something like, "I stopped playing WoW, but" or "I personally didn't care for WoW, but."

On the one hand, this effort at objectivity makes WoW's win even more impressive. Perhaps it's a bit like Time magazine's Person of the Year -- the choice is not necessarily a positive role model; it's just someone who significantly influenced world events for good or ill.

On the other hand, it's remarkable to hear people saying the equivalent of "this is the Game of the Decade *despite the fact that I don't want to play it*."

Gustav Andreasson
profile image
World of Warcraft is without doubt a brilliant business idea and offers a near-limitless amount of gaming hours to the player, but along with it comes a lack innovation in terms of gameplay as well as mutability. The game itself is very enjoyable in my opinion, but it never lets you feel like the hero you set out to be, as half of the global gaming community triumphs along with you in every turn.

Gary Hutton
profile image
Glad to see Shadow of the Colossus and Katamari continue to appear in best of lists, and for all the right reasons.

Anyone surprised to see WoW at the top of the list...shouldn't be. Drop the name of the game to nearly anyone, and they will have heard of it, and know it's a game.

Even my bingo playing 95 year-old great-aunt knows what WoW is..."It's that computer game thing where that Mr. T fellow throws grenades at you..."

Anyone who desires to learn how to entice people into a gargantuan world with 100's of hours of play ahead of them to see endgame, never mind ALL the content....needs to pay attention to what Blizzard has done, and continues to do to keep veterans returning and noobs leveling from 1 to 80. Whether those elements are completely ethical is another topic...

No, it's not Katamari...or GTA3...but innovation isn't always the lynchpin to success, sometimes quality and continuously incorporating the best of gaming's ideas (even if your competitors thought of them first) is enough to keep people riveted.

Look at Halo...continuously trumpeted as a contender for best game etc, but it certainly didn't invent the genre.

It will be a strange day when WoW shuts down it's servers, if that day ever comes. And as for all the people who said they didn't like WoW or had stopped playing...either "the lady doth protest too much", or someone got too close to becoming another WoWhead.

David Tarris
profile image
Deus Ex is without a doubt my favorite game of all time, but I'm surprised to see it standing shoulder to shoulder with a global and cultural phenomenon like World of WarCraft. It's easy for me to forget that I'm not the last man on Earth who still remembers the game, but it truly pioneered a level of choice in games through both dialogue and interactions with the environment that hasn't been matched since.

Llaura Mcgee
profile image
In the list making spirit, here's my top 10 games Gamasutra readers overlooked. ;)

10. Knights of the Old Republic

9. Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time

8. World of Goo - When such a small title is my GotY, facing great competition from GTA, Fable, L4D, Braid etc etc, then you know it's special.

7. Ico - I find SotC rather overrated, especially in consideration of its (imo obviously) artistically more successful and focused predecessor.

6. Mother 3

5. Beyond Good & Evil

4. Psychonauts

3. Half-Life 2: Episode 2

2. Vampire Masquerade: Bloodlines - The only game that took what Deus Ex was trying to do and ran with it. Easily the best written game yet.

1. Majora's Mask - The best, most progressive and least Zelda like incarnation of the series. A sideways, often uncomfortable (what a risky opening) look at society.

Really, there's so many more I could mention (Wario Ware, Counter-Strike, Ikaruga, Rez, Rock Band, Oblivion, Eternal Darkness, Vietiful Joe, Snake Eater, Cave Story, Perfect Dark, Advance Wars, Paper Mario 2, Rome: Total War, Thief 2 and on...).

Alistair Langfield
profile image
It's been a good decade of gaming that is for sure.

Matt Mihaly
profile image
I wonder if Farmville should have been on there. It's far more popular, measured by users, than anything else on this list. Nothing on this list even comes close, though popularity isn't the end-all, be-all by any means.

Jonathon Walsh
profile image
@Paul Glad to see someone else appreciated Ico over SotC. I love both but I find Ico a lot more moving and atmospheric than SotC. On the other hand I think SotC is the more innovative of the two titles so I can see why it would make the list.

Rod Keller
profile image
I agree, Farmville is about to do more to impact the gaming scene than WoW will. I've never seen my mother, brother, sister and other non-gamers have that *need* in their eyes to use a computer since this game. And, it's simplistic design that allows for progression but weens addiction by disconnecting the user for hours makes it a healthier online experience. What did WoW do? It just took elements from the many MMO's before it, polished them, put the blizzard stamp on and away it went.

Many players who still play WoW who I talk to don't even like the game. They play it out of habit. I can't make a statement for all WoW players, but I've heard many make similar assessments. So I mean, is it the most played game? No. Is it revolutionary in design? No. Is it the best game of the past 10 years? Hardly.

Curtis Turner - IceIYIaN
profile image
World of WarCraft, hands down. Half-Life 2 might have countless mods, but WoW does too and the only thing you can edit is the HUD pretty much. When you first get the game it's perhaps one of the dullest games you'll ever play. Continue to play and the addiction can only gets worse. Finally you're wondering why you're just not into playing other games anymore.

WoW has one of the best config/hotkeys in any game, period. At level 80 I have more hotkeys than probably five games combined. Also showing that a mouse and keyboard still crushes other types of control.

Screenshots matter more than ever. You've probably taken them in other games, but after some time in WoW you'll have countless amounts of them.

Sure, mad n00bZ, lots of heros, but still plenty of legends and myths. They day I put Icy Chill enchant on the Grand Marshal Warblade made me one of the most powerful players on the Ruin Battle Group for I'd say a year. Then look at the players who've made movies. The viewers they get is countless.

The amount of content is insane. From textures, sounds, models, game engine, etc etc etc. It's endless.

Dan Saundberg
profile image
Opinions and felling is all good and nice, but lets cut the bullshit and do the math.

The top12 games of the decade are the top12 highest grossing games. So add up the number of sales for all platforms and that is the REAL top12 games of the decade!

Rod Keller
profile image
@Daniel, Even that doesn't well describe "Top".

Top is so vague and probably best matched with "Best". And the HUGE problem with Best Game is the vague basis upon what the best is. Does it selling the most make it the best game, or the biggest seller? Does it being the most influential make it the best designed? Does having the best graphics give it the best sound? Does the fact that YOU like the game beat all other catagories? If you don't have a real scoring system you can hardly fairly match any game against another. How do you rate the addicting qualities of WoW to the stellar story of Half-Life 2 and pick a winner? Why is addiction rated higher, and what is the numeric value? How are you going to rate the genre defining The Sims vs the perfected formula of Halo?

Honestly the votes of lists like this come down to a convoluted attempt at people trying to sum up all these many qualities of great games and a "feel-out" process on which comes on top. And considering different people rate things differently, almost everyone looks at Top Best Game lists and thinks "It's wrong" or at the very least "It's in the wrong order".

What would be a much more interesting list would be Gamasutra's Top 12 Favorite Games of the Decade as voted by the community. Then you are absolutely free to abandon the restraints of having to weigh each game by individual merits and just say whichever one pleases you the most, and best of all, the end list can't be disputed. It got the most votes, so therefore it was the favorite.

Sorry to rant so much, I've just read so many of these lists and a little person inside of me cries out. =)

Philip Riley
profile image
@ David Tarris

I cannot disagree with this list either. I was nervous that Deus Ex wasn't included, and was fully prepared to scoff at this IMHO glaring omission. Yet it pleasantly, and deservedly, landed at number two.

I've played many games and enjoyed the satisfaction of completing them. DX is the only one that was bittersweet in beating it. I was sad that the journey had to come to an end.

FWIW, another DX game is in the works....

Ted Brown
profile image
I hope for a time I can play Shadow of Colossus without wanting to snap the controller in half out of frustration, boredom, or both. For now, I must respect it from a distance. =)

Dan VanBogelen
profile image
WoW clearly has the biggest impact world wide, and just due to the number of people that have played it, it would win the #1 spot do to the majority vote. I don't think there is any other game out there that is so big that it could cause government officials to fight over the regulations of an entire genre, like WoW has done in China.

A Game like WoW came along and proved that there is big money to be made in MMO's. It has created a huge boom in the genre, and the race to create the next "WoW killer".

WoW has embed itself into the culture in a way to create cartoon episodes, memorable Youtube Videos, and 10 minute celebrities (what was that question posed on Jeopardy?).

Diego Perez Martinez
profile image
I was just reading number one and thinking that i would have preferred it to be Deus Ex than World of Warcraft; then I heard a WOW commercial in the kitchen while my mother is preparing the New Year's Eve dinner.

You Win Blizzard.

Tim Johnston
profile image
Deus Ex...finally getting its true recognition.

To this day I have dreams of a GTA, sandbox style game that is the rebirth of Deus Ex. Imagine Deus Ex as an open, persistant world, and has the same well-crafted backstory that reveals itself through dialog and game interaction. The same LOD of weapons/augs would be there, but this time its your factions/alliances that determine your ability to advance. Everything would have that persistant feel to it, and at the same time would appear to be escalating from a story pacing standpoint, until you become involved and start making choices, then it accelerates, and the game world seems to start evolving even more rapidly.

Someone....for the love of God...please make this game!

Ruthaniel van-den-Naar
profile image
Very stupid list..

Bryan OHara
profile image
I had this sinking feeling as I was reading through the article that I was getting closer and closer to number 1 and yet WoW hadn't been mentioned yet. I cringe at the thought of it being top game of the decade, but it had an undeniable effect on the modern MMO industry.

I still think Guitar Hero should have been mentioned. It did wonders for reaching audiences that would normally never play a video game.

Anthony Charles
profile image
I didn't realize how much people loved Deus Ex.

Jason Ferguson
profile image
Not a bad list. I don't agree with all of the entries on there, but there have been so many great games that you can't possibly include them all.

I DO hate seeing Halo on there, though.

Luis Guimaraes
profile image
@Dan VanBogelen

I really doubt anybody can a make the next "WoW killer", unless it's called WoH (World of Halo), WoGoW (World of Gears/God of War), WoMF (World of Madden Football), WoSvdR (World of Smackdown vs Raw) or WoTS (World of The Sims)... In others words, do the same that WoW did, better. Maybe I'd give World of Shadow of the Colossus, Bayonetta or Soul Calibur a go... Too bad there's no World of Castlevania...

@Rod Keller

All agreed.

Carl Chavez
profile image
I think it comes down to how one interprets "Game of the Decade".

If one thinks it means "Absolute Best Game of the Decade", as Gamasutra posed verbatim in its original question, then of course people are going to want their favorite game there. In that case, I'd vote for Civilization IV or Pokémon Platinum, not WoW.

However, if one thinks it means "Most Important Game of the Decade", then a lot more than fun has to be factored. The problem with using fun as the primary factor in the decision is that fun is too subjective. Many other factors, such as (but not exclusively) game design influence, narrative, range of appeal, graphics, sound, profitability, sales longevity, long-term replayability, and player loyalty must be considered. That is why I ended up voting for WoW.

As for Farmville, it hasn't proven itself yet. Although it has many millions of players, it hasn't proven to cause those players to play or buy more games. Although there are several copycats around now, it has nowhere near the game design influence of something like Half-Life 2 or Bejeweled. It hasn't proven itself to be playable for several years, and though it is probably profitable, it makes nowhere near the profit of top-tier games, and some people are suspicious of the ways it makes money. It might make the list of "most influential games, 2000-2019", but we don't have enough data yet.

[User Banned]
profile image
This user violated Gamasutra’s Comment Guidelines and has been banned.

Scott Muir
profile image
I'm glad to see Deus Ex getting some well-deserved respect. Maybe the order of the top 4 could be disputed, but I completely agree with the choices.

Jonny Cook
profile image
Am I the only one that thinks at least _one_ of the Metal Gear Solids deserves a place on this list?

Dave Endresak
profile image
I'll just offer one quick note for everyone to consider.

I find these types of lists interesting because they tend to be very ethnocentric due to the fact that the gaming industry tends to be locked into its own localized views by issues such as language barriers. For example, some posters have mentioned World of Warcraft, but WoW has not had a huge impact IF the entire global market is considered because it has not had a huge impact in Asian markets compared to other games there. This is also true for many other titles that are considered "big" in specific markets but are unknown or relatively unpopular elsewhere in the world. This is important when these types of lists are complied because gaming is actually global in nature regardless of various barriers that lead to ethnocentrism in voting lists, reviews, and even game creation/design.

I think it would be nice if the gamers around the world would be much more proactive in recognizing this particular issue, especially since it has been reported on by both gaming and mainstream mass media sources numerous times over the years.

Dave Endresak
profile image
Sorry... I just realized I wanted to make one more comment about one particular quote.

I am wondering about Mike Orenich from LucasArts because it seems like he has very faulty memory of the game. For one thing, the game was Game of the Year for 1999; it was not released in 2000 (No One Lives Forever was Game of the Year for 2000... and actually should be on this list, in my view). Perhaps more significantly, the story of Deus Ex is that the Statue of Liberty, not the World Trade Center, has been blown up by "terrorists," but this was actually done as part of a conspiracy between government and corporate America in order to consolidate power over the vast majority of the population.

I just find it odd that not only would someone who evidently voted for Deus Ex make such mistakes, but that Gamasutra would choose such incorrect quotes about the game for their article.

Carl Chavez
profile image
@Dave Endresak: your point about ethnocentrism is interesting, but your example of WoW may not be a good example. In 2008, WoW was #1 worldwide in MMOs, possibly making more money than the next four games combined (all Asian games: Fantasy Westward Journey, Maple Story, Shanda, and Lineage I/II). Additionally, WoW's economic effect on secondary markets in Asia is quite significant, since Asia generates a large amount of gold, items, and accounts and exports them to the rest of the world. That is both economically and culturally interesting, since that wealth is actually generating additional revenue in the markets beyond the subscription or free-to-play revenue that goes to the game company.

Better examples of ethnocentricity might be something like the games of the Dragon Quest, Monster Hunter, or Pro Evolution Soccer series. Dragon Quest and Monster Hunter are huge in Japan but not anywhere else. Pro Evolution Soccer is big in Japan and Europe but barely noticed in North America. All three series have games that could arguably be in a "Best of the Decade" list.

profile image
Off the top of my head (long line of games in that time), so I might be missing some, my top 10 would be:

These are based of of fun factor. A game in my top 10 will have playability, meaning these are games that I remember being attached to from beginning to end, almost non stop. Basically a game you can't put down, and would usually want to pick right back up after finishing (if it has an end).

10 Counter-Strike Source

9 Resident Evil 4

8 Warcraft III

7 Deus Ex

6 World of Warcraft

5 Metal Gear Solid 4

4 Shadow of the Colossus

3 Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater

2 Final Fantasy XII (spell lag kinda lowered this or it would be #1. The spell lag made spell strategies not possible late in the game)

1 Final Fantasy X

Games I would have liked to include, but couldn't. They're on a similar level as the top 10:

Final Fantasy X-2

Half-Life 2

Ninja Gaiden 1/2

Fallout 3

Everquest expansions (reaching here, but I can't make a best of list without sneaking in EQ, it's still my favorite MMORPG)

Everquest II

Street Fighter IV

Digital Devil Saga 1/2

Tekken 6

and I'm sure a bunch of others I'm missing.

[User Banned]
profile image
This user violated Gamasutra’s Comment Guidelines and has been banned.

Matt Ross
profile image
this is actually a really good list, as soon as you rid yourself of any notion that this is a list of THE BEST games of the decade. some of them are there for being really good, some are there for being different AND really popular... its a list of memorable games...

the one that pisses me off the most is HALO.

lets not kid ourselves here, the only reason this is here is because it was the first really popular CONSOLE FPS. if it was PC only it would have been forgotten about instantly. its average, but its THE BEST console people had.

I feel the same kinda rings true for Mass Effect, but I don't play RPGs, so I can't comment.

as for WoW being the Biggest game of the naughties? well OF COURSE it is, You can't argue with that??

Its by NO means THE BEST game, I think Deus Ex landing spot two simply for being awesome cements it as BEST game of the decade. but the fact that WoW's world is a pretty Gamery world, AND they charge you for every second spent in it, and yet they STILL attract more players than most other games, is quite an achievement.

on that note, I know this is an industry site, but... any chance of a BEST games of the decade list? what developers thing are truly great games regardless of their success, for instance, a list where MW2 would be marked down for hurting the community, a list where WoW's popularity would have nothing to do with it. you certainly can't go to the fanatic hype infected game reviewer for this....

for me Hl2 would be in there.

and if you were to count the Orange box as one? (which I would) it was def the best for me.

Uncharted 2 would at least get an honourable mention, despite the somewhat stale story and premise behind it, its just done SO DAMN WELL! I don't play many games (as may be evident by my shitty list), the one I play the most is Starcraft, that was released the decade before! but uncharted 2 rekindled my interest and has prompted me to try more games.

Wilfredo Ruiz
profile image
I thought the list was pretty good. I liked the fact that Deus Ex was up there. Thief and Deus Ex are still my two favorite games of all time. I too was pissed that Halo and Mass Effect were there. I think Oblivion could have taken one of those spots, even with its shortcomings. I also like the fact that there are mostly smarter gamers making comments on this website.

David Tarris
profile image
@Matt Rose

Trying not to kid myself here, but I'm a PC gamer who actually enjoyed Halo for what it was: a refreshing take on the FPS whose gameplay was centered around the strengths of the console and came out better for it. It had a lot of subtle innovations that, like all things, it may not have been the absolute first game to do, but was certainly the game to popularize. For example, the holy trinity of grenade/melee/gun, the limitation of carrying two weapons at a time, seamless blend of ground and vehicular combat, regenerating health system, sophisticated enemy AI, cooperative campaign mode, and the list goes on.

I think the game had a lot going for it, console or otherwise. I understand there are many PC elitists who will never accept that fact, but hopefully you're not one of them.

Anyhow, I like this list because it gives you a good taste of what the wider community of people who play and have been inspired by games from the past ten years really derive inspiration from. Unlike the vocal minority here that complains about the proper criteria for every inclusion and omission, just taking the list for what it is, you get a good feel for where this industry's headed in the next ten years. Afterall, if these are the games that game developers think were the "top" games of the past decade, whether for attempted objective or shamelessly subjective reasons, then I'm sure we can expect more games like these in the years to come.

[User Banned]
profile image
This user violated Gamasutra’s Comment Guidelines and has been banned.

Sean Barton
profile image
All the games listed deserve their honors, and I know that no list will appease everyone, but it's a real shame that Guitar Hero or Rock Band aren't on there. Plastic rock was such a huge part of this past decade.

David Tarris
profile image
"Real hardcore gamers are not "PC elitists" they are platform agonstic, I've owned every platform and played them all like a real hardcore gamer would"

Well, okay buddy, so you're a "REAL hardcore gamer", but I was talking specifically about "PC elitists" (hence my use of the term in the first place) who feel that an FPS made for consoles will always be inferior due to a lack of the unrealistically accurate aiming that exists on the PC.

So what we end up with is a situation where you feel the game gets undue credit from the gamers who just aren't extreme enough to "roll with your crew" (or whatever REAL HARDCORE gamers do nowadays), and where I feel that it gets undue criticism from gaming elitists who think that because something attains mainstream popularity, or uses a control stick instead of a mouse, that somehow makes it worse.

In some ways, and in some cases, we may both be right, but at the end of the day, it's hard to deny that, for better or worse, Halo had a profound impact on the evolution of the FPS as we know it today. Call of Duty may be the game plotting the evolutionary course for the next ten years, but I believe the 00's were defined by what Half-Life and Halo established.

Jen Bauer
profile image
Metroid Prime? Come on.

Adolfo Sehnert
profile image
Just a question: in the real life you count starting from 1 till 10 (as all normal people) or from zero till 9?

If is right the first, why you realy don't wait that this decade (2001-2010) must be done?

Ori Inbar
profile image
This list shows the amazing progress gaming made this decade. What will happen in the next decade?

I bet games will escape the screen and integrate with the real world a la augmented reality.

Did you know such games already appeared in 2009?

To see a glimpse of the possibilities check out the augmented reality games of 2009 at

Carl Chavez
profile image
@Adolfo: Game developers consider time zero-based, including decades and centuries. ;-)

Wilfredo Ruiz
profile image
@ Jen Grier

I didn't get the Metroid Prime pick either.

Adolfo Sehnert
profile image
@Carl: thanks :)

(*he grabs pen and paper and writes: developers are not normal people they count from 0 till 9*)

Jay Simmons
profile image
Metroid Prime? Yeah I agree with the above post. I couldn't get past the wonky controls and the game didn't really hook me at all. The other picks I could see why they would be on the list for various reasons but Metroid Prime seemed just like a really average Game Cube game in the Game Cube's already average lineup.

profile image
Well metroid prime to me was a very good game, but with so many games in a decade I don't know if I could put it up there. The article is correct in their assessment about it successfully bringing the 2D metroid feel and atmosphere to 3D, something many other 2D games have failed at (I'm looking at you Castlevania).

Christopher McLaren
profile image
One thing that I noticed is that there are no DS or PSP games. Why is this? Is it because these platforms mainly get ports of games? Or do they lack the creative innovation? Or are they just not very good games on these systems? Or do they lack the ability to push the boundaries due to not have the processing power (doesn't amek sense as the Wii manages this).

DukeJake R
profile image
Have to agree with Deus Ex. I love Mass Effect but Deus Ex is just so much deeper with so much more replay value. I personally found Half Life 2 to be a dissapointment. Loved the first one that came out in 1998, but HL2 only really added the gravity gun (physics puzzles? Because we can!) and as a game it was extremely linear. HL2 was basically a decent shooter with a half-decent story (that was never properly explained).

No mention of casual games in this list - which is odd as numbers-wise the average gamer is a businessman on the train playing bejewelled on his iphone. Not a geek in his bedroom bathed in the glow of his alienware as he frags his way through the night.

Mike Engle
profile image
HL2, Halo, and Metroid Prime seem a bit shaky.

My "favorites of the decade" list would include:

* Team Fortress 2

* Planetside

* Geometry Wars 2

* Puzzle Quest

* Rez

Runners up would go to Quake Wars and Puzzle Pirates.

Tim Carter
profile image
Grist for the mill.

Christopher Kipp
profile image
what the fuck puzzle Quest is so fucking stupid what r u thinking

DukeJake R
profile image
I can't argue with the impact that WoW has had over the last decade, but I have an issue with this game being number one. My question is this; would WoW be game of the decade if it wasn't massively multiplayer? Would 8 million people be playing it if they hadn't struck up friendships with people online? If it wasn't an online game then it would be "Oblivion" set in a different universe and I don't see Oblivion in the list.

So for me, as a purely standalone experience and for immersion in a well designed open ended game, I have to say Deus Ex should be game of the decade.