Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
The Valve Way: Gabe Newell And Erik Johnson Speak
View All     RSS
October 21, 2014
arrowPress Releases
October 21, 2014
PR Newswire
View All

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

The Valve Way: Gabe Newell And Erik Johnson Speak

August 29, 2011 Article Start Previous Page 4 of 4

Now I know Valve doesn't have job titles, but when it comes to DotA what is your responsibility to that project?

EJ: [Looks to Newell] What's my responsibility on this project?

GN: Uh... Being Meepo's punching bag.

EJ: The reason we don't have titles is partly because everybody does so many different things.

GN: Erik, more than almost anybody else at the company, does whatever he needs to get done at the time. So he'd be pretty hard to define.

Doug Lombardi, PR: Utility infielder.

GN: Utility infielder. We were just talking about this, actually, ourselves -- it's like this event wouldn't be possible without the group of people we have, and the weird sets of skills that they have. Like Milton [Ngan] figuring out that we had a networking cable, and that's why we had to pause that game. Like I could've spent five years before I figured it out... How often do you have a bad networking cable?

EJ: We have an architect who's a level designer -- he designed this booth. It's kind of handy to have an architect who can do this kind of thing.

GN: So people always are finding different ways to create value. And you saw the trailer, right? That's done in-engine with the game assets. And a whole bunch of people on the team jumped on that and made that happen. And nobody said, you know, "What's my title? I don't see 'cinematics' anywhere in my title." Or, "This isn't using Maya, so I'm not going to work on it."

EJ: Especially, internally, on a team, I've never seen a case where a title has any positive value in any organization; they're only used for bad or evil, internally.

It seems it's also the fact that you don't give people titles so they don't feel they're restricted. It's also, from your perspective, managing, saying you'll allow people to do what they want to do.

GN: Yeah, nobody can ever say "that's not my job." Nobody ever gets to let themselves off the hook. If there's a problem, you've gotta fix it.

But you also don't say to people, "That's not your job."

GN: Right, we never tell anybody, "That's not your job." In fact, we love it when people make problems their problems. The worst thing to do when a group of people get together is point out a problem because you know what's going to happen!

EJ: "I'm really upset about the way we're doing this!" That's your job now!

GN: [laughs] Yeah, congratulations!

There seems to be a lot of kvetching at other game companies, but people don't have the power to address what they're complaining about.

GN: I don't know about other game companies, but it's dangerous to kvetch at Valve. You're suddenly Director of Fixing That Shit! Vice President of It's Your Problem Now.

But it does reduce -- you can't really blame anybody else, and everybody knows that. I don't know, I think it's a great company to work at in terms of... To take a step back, the big contest, the big competitive issue over the industry is, how do you attract and keep and make productive, really smart, hardworking people? And so you need to create an environment with those people who are most likely to come, and most likely to stay, and where they do their best work, and that's what Valve is designed to do. And if we stop doing that we'll evaporate relatively quickly.

Erik could get a job at EA in 15 seconds, right? He's not at Valve because he couldn't work some place else -- he's at Valve because Adrian's there and IceFrog's there and all of these other people are there. And that's why he feels like he gets more work done and has more fun getting it done.

One of the nice things about games right now is that it seems like there's a fair amount of people who are now doing things deliberately, and because they want to. And finding success. Because if you can't find some sort of success you can't continue to do things deliberately and because you want to.

GN: Well, I think, at the end of the day, the challenge is to find exciting, worthwhile projects for smart people to do. And then whether you're doing it as an individual, whether you're doing it as a small indie developer, or you're doing it as a larger group, if you can answer that question you're probably going to be successful.

If you can do something, see how the audience is reacting, and iterate on that feedback in a productive way, you're going to be successful. If you can't, then you're eventually -- regardless of how big your franchise is or how much advertising money you throw at it -- you're eventually going to fail. So that's sort of the scale and variance challenge in our industry right now.

You do a tremendous amount of playtesting internally. I guess that's perceived as "the Valve way."

GN: Yeah, we don't understand how not to do that. I mean shipping a product is just another way of expanding your playtest group, right? You just have a bunch more people. We have the tools now to see how the game is performing, either to expectations or not, and then keep fixing it. The more we do that, the happier our audiences are and the bigger they get.

You've had more of a platform mix now. In a way I think of Portal 2 as being a very big game on consoles. Especially because no one knows how many copies you sold on Steam. I can't say what it's a bigger game for, but it certainly had a huge amount of mindshare on consoles. And Counter-Strike Go will also potentially have a huge amount of mindshare on consoles. Again, do you have a strategy, or does it speak to the games that you're making?

GN: We can never predict; I mean we just try to build good games and then we tend to be surprised. Portal 2 did better on the PC than it did on the consoles; Left 4 Dead did better on the consoles than it did on the PC. So you know we don't try to guess, because we're not sure what value there is to guessing. We've never had a situation where we said, "We really, really want to build something that is more popular for the console guys." Because usually we have a bunch of other higher priority problems we want to solve. So we're glad that people want to play our games wherever they want to play.

I actually would've guessed the reverse, in those two examples.

GN: There you go! That's why we don't try to optimize, because you would be wrong.

Article Start Previous Page 4 of 4

Related Jobs

Zindagi Games
Zindagi Games — Camarillo, California, United States

MOBILE Art Director
Treyarch / Activision
Treyarch / Activision — Santa Monica, California, United States

Senior UI Artist (temporary) Treyarch
Treyarch / Activision
Treyarch / Activision — Santa Monica, California, United States

Lead UI Artist
Treyarch / Activision
Treyarch / Activision — Santa Monica, California, United States

UI Artist/Visual Designer (temporary) Treyarch


mark cocjin
profile image
I think that Gabe Newell is the only games industry leader I know that's of the same level as Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Unfortunately, of the three, only Gabe gets gaming. While Steve Jobs' charisma relies heavily on the magic of his products' presentation, Gabe's works are more of an industry changer behind the curtains. You never see him reach rockstar status since he credits everyone else for his success.

I call it a silent respect the industry and community has of him. The rest would prefer calling it being part of the Hammer Legionnaries.

It's really unfortunate that Valve is content to doing Valve stuff. The gigantic games corporations spend a lot of money puffing themselves up to overshadow the real heroes of gaming. The developers. We have great developers being swallowed up by these corporations who take advantage of them due to their hunger and lack of self management. Valve was right with seeing some games only existing due to the magic of a certain team being together. A lot of these magical teams have died throughout gaming's history. Their DNA spread across several other development teams are really never the same.

Good job Gamasutra. A lot of your articles have always been like lectures or college thesis for me but this is really fun to read. I'm surprised there hasn't been an interview with GabeN and company yet that followed a BBC Hard Talk format on camera.

manou manou
profile image
"The gigantic games corporations spend a lot of money puffing themselves up to overshadow the real heroes of gaming. The developers." - You sir are my hero :) Businesses must be shaped from the people behind them not the other way around, as it is now. 95% of the value is created by the programmers and artists and yet most of the rewards go to the... you know, the parasites with the suits. If I make a game some day the big publishers will not get one cent! I will give the game for free and die of hunger instead of let those leeches just stand there consume what I've created.

Matt Hackett
profile image
> Valve doesn't have job titles


mark cocjin
profile image
Those are specializations. When they're working, they can choose to work on anything. Nobody is somebody's boss in a team. There's a Cabal leader but that job is just to oversee everything.

People there just pick what they want to do. You can't do that if you have a job description that limits you.

Joe McGinn
profile image
It's inspiring stuff, but you also have to be realistic. Most companies do not have the financial freedom to operate this way. Keeping in mind that Valve had that freedom, from day 1, with money earned in another business.

Samuel Batista
profile image
I think looking at publicly traded publishers and Valve as "good vs evil" is a gross simplification of the situation. Fact is, Valve has one of the best (if not the best) work environment in the entire industry, because they hire the best, and have a very lax attitude towards product development. But they can do this because they have the most talented and motivated employees, as well as a good development structure, that leads them to create a stream of amazing game after amazing game. It's a self realizing prophecy, and I really wish I could work for them.

But fact of the matter is that I'm nowhere near as talented or experienced as most people working at Valve, but I'm extremely thankful and fortunate to work for a publicly traded company that is owned and funded by a publisher. I don't care that investors will ultimately reap the fruits of my hard work, I have a great job, I work with awesome people, and I get paid enough to live a comfortable life and buy loads of games.

Ultimately, it doesn't matter if you work for a publisher that will suck all the profits. It only really matters that you work for a publisher that sees employees and development studios as indispensable (and precious) resources for their business.

Anner Bonilla
profile image
Completely true at the end the most important thing is that you have fun and you do what you love.

Neeraj Kumar
profile image
Great interview :)

DotA is the most SuperbAwesomeFantasticAddictiveSatisfyingCompetitiveComplexTeam game i ever played :D

My dream is to work with them :)

Mathieu MarquisBolduc
profile image
"Instead of having some person review all the products that are going on at Valve, you can tell how a product's doing based on how willing people are to go and work on it. We know a product's pretty likely to be successful, or fun, or at least fun to work on, if lots of people are going to working on it. It's a good method."

Working in a large studio, Ive often thought about that. Some recent projects proved me wrong thought, with a popular project going to hell, and an unpopular one getting an unexpected good vibe. Things can turn around so fast. At the very least, it tells the management which projects are in need of more scrutiny.

One thing I do with my friends is betting on the metacritic of our project, during beta. The median of the bets is never far from the truth.

Casey Labine
profile image
This feel-good blather is pure stealth marketing on Valve's part. DotA 2 is a carbon copy of DotA, roughly analogous to Halo: Combat Evolved Anniversary. They know full well it's going to be F2P. As for IceFrog, anyone involved with the Warcraft 3 modding scene is aware of how sketchy he is.

Shekhar Gyanwali
profile image
@mark cocjin

I'll buy that.