Our Properties: Gamasutra GameCareerGuide IndieGames Indie Royale GDC IGF Game Developer Magazine GAO
My Message close
Contents
The Trouble with Typecasting: Starbreeze, Syndicate, and the Future
 
 
Printer-Friendly VersionPrinter-Friendly Version
 
Latest News
spacer View All spacer
 
February 23, 2012
 
Interview: Silver Dollar uses XBLIG for its mad experiments
 
Last year's Supreme Court case on games cost California $1.8M [6]
 
GDC 2012 details Moriarty, Della Rocca, 'Rant' sessions in Education Summit [1]
spacer
Latest Jobs
spacer View All     Post a Job     RSS spacer
 
February 23, 2012
 
2K Games
Public Relations Manager - 2K Games
 
2K Marin
Level Designer
 
2K Marin
Senior Rendering Programmer
 
Zindagi Games
Presentation/Game Programmer
 
The Workshop
Art Director
 
Blizzard Entertainment
Senior Software Engineer, Tools
spacer
Latest Features
spacer View All spacer
 
February 23, 2012
 
arrow Postmortem: Days of Wonder's Ticket to Ride Pocket [1]
 
arrow Sponsored Feature: Canada - Scoring High as a Game Nation [3]
 
arrow The Vita Interview [19]
 
arrow Gamification Dynamics: Identity and Story [7]
 
arrow What Makes Social Games Social? [3]
 
arrow Will Tablet Game Quality Soon Leapfrog Consoles? [27]
 
arrow Tearing Down Barriers: How to Bring MMO Players Together [10]
 
arrow Withstanding the Collapse of the Middle [4]
spacer
Latest Blogs
spacer View All     Post     RSS spacer
 
February 23, 2012
 
Piracy and the four currencies [5]
 
The Secondary Costs of Outsourcing [10]
 
Sixty to Zero [4]
 
The Combinatorial Itch [5]
 
God Games and the Superman Complex [13]
spacer
About
spacer Editor-In-Chief/News Director:
Kris Graft
Features Director:
Christian Nutt
Senior Contributing Editor:
Brandon Sheffield
News Editors:
Frank Cifaldi, Tom Curtis, Mike Rose, Eric Caoili, Kris Graft
Editors-At-Large:
Leigh Alexander, Chris Morris
Advertising:
Jennifer Sulik
Recruitment:
Gina Gross
 
Feature Submissions
 
Comment Guidelines
Sponsor
Features
  The Trouble with Typecasting: Starbreeze, Syndicate, and the Future
by Christian Nutt [Business, Interview]
5 comments Share on Twitter Share on Facebook RSS
 
 
January 20, 2012 Article Start Page 1 of 3 Next
 

Actors can carve out successful careers by being typecast -- whenever there's a stock character to be portrayed, casting directors know where to go. So, too, can studios become go-to houses for particular types of games. Does this bring bigger security, or lead to bigger problems?

Mikael Nermark, CEO of Starbreeze Studios, can't be sure. The developer grabbed the industry's attention with The Chronicles of Riddick -- an immersive, atmospheric, and adventures first person game that has become the go-to title for "better than the movie it's based on."


But with The Darkness and now the upcoming reboot of Syndicate for the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3, to be published by Electronic Arts, is the studio in danger of being pigeonholed? What if the industry swerves again, and FPSes are less relevant?

In this interview, Nermark discusses this issue -- and what he sees as the studio's future.

How long have you been working on this game?

Mikael Nermark: We've been working about three years.

There's sort of a trend lately of old, classic games coming back and being reenvisioned as an FPS. Do you consider that to be a trend?

MN: Yeah, I think there's a trend to it somewhat. We'd been asked by EA -- they came to us, and this is what we know; this is were our expertise lies. So that's why we made it an FPS.

Yeah, you're sort of specialized as a studio, and focused on FPSes.

MN: Yeah, exactly. The legacy comes from the Riddick games, of course, and The Darkness -- action-adventure games in the first-person genre.

Do you have your own tech, or are you using licensed tech?

MN: No, it's our own tech. It's 14 years old now.

You brought on a writer to work on the scenario in this game?

MN: Yeah.

Who is that?

MN: Richard Morgan. He's a sci-fi writer.

Did he come to the studio, or did he stay wherever he is?

MN: No, no; he didn't work with the studio the whole time, but he came.

Was it more of a pure writing process, or was it more of a process with the team, with the designers?

MN: It was a process with the designers, definitely. I also think, whether it's on this game or other games I've worked on, it's always good to have great new people from other parts of the entertainment industry to be part of what we're doing. Part of what we're doing is an experience that we're doing in the process.

What do you particularly like about bringing people in from outside the game space?

MN: The view they bring in. They bring something new to the table all of the time. Maybe it doesn't always fit into what we do, but it makes us open our eyes and see what else is out there and how other people perceive different things.

The things games are good at are interactive moments, right? Things that other media are good at are other things. Do you ever have to worry about balance?

MN: I trust my designers to make good judgments on that, but I think the broader the view you have, the better. You learn from stuff, and you grow from stuff; you're trying to make the best of everything you can.


Starbreeze Studios' Syndicate

Looking at it, I can't say for sure, but it seems like one of your biggest productions ever.

MN: It is our biggest production ever!

Is that in terms of length? Is that in terms of people working on it? Is that in terms of everything, basically?

MN: In terms of everything.

Did you expand the studio, or did you work with outside contractors?

MN: We used some outside contractors. This is the first time Starbreeze has ever done that. Yeah, we worked with a bigger team than we ever did before.

To compete in the FPS genre is extremely challenging. The expectations that players have for games like this are exceedingly high these days.

MN: Definitely. Look at what's out there. You have to trust your own skills and realize what your strengths are. I think we did that, and I'm extremely proud of the studio and the guys working on the team. But it's definitely a hard genre to be in, no doubt.

When you say your own strengths, what would you consider to be your strengths?

MN: Story-driven games; narrative-view games. What made Riddick and Darkness good: the story-driven, narrative single-player experience. That's our strength.

Do you have designers in the studio who are particularly concerned with narrative?

MN: Definitely, yes. We have different designers for different parts; you know, it's always a group of designers making a game, and we're trying to make everything as good as we can.

How is the design team organized? Does it break down in a certain way? Are there narrative designers like clusters, or does the design team all feed back and forth?

MN: All feed back and forth. When we do productions, we'll have cross-discipline groups.

So are you set up in cabals, or pods?

MN: In pods.

How are they organized? What is each group working on?

MN: It depends on when in production, but when we start up we try to explore the production team and say, "This is the game we're going to make. Set this goal together with whomever you work." Then we split up and build the different parts of the game. We try to do the cross-discipline. You have this little work together... We try to focus; everyone has dependencies on the next guy, all the time, and you try to fit that into a good pipeline and a good process. I think that's why it's important to have cross-discipline groups.

 
Article Start Page 1 of 3 Next
 
Comments

Christian Philippe Guay
profile image
Great interview.

Starbreeze is an amazing developer, my personal top one since I played Chronicles of Riddick on the first Xbox, but the studio always failed at one thing and I hope they finally fixed it. Mutliplayer always been somehow their Achille's heel.

Both Chronicles of Riddick and The Darkness featured an interesting multiplayer, but something had to be wrong in the network code, because no matter how good our connections were it was still lagging (like crazy).

If they fixed that issue, they would make a lot of fans very happy.

Ernest Adams
profile image
It looks like a fine game in its own right, but I do wish EA had more respect for the fans of its original IP -- and perhaps more confidence in their own ability to bring new IP to market. Why call this "Syndicate"? It's clearly not Syndicate. Presumably they did it because they felt it had some name recognition; but the fans of the original Syndicate are getting old and may not be that interested in FPSs any more, and the name won't mean anything to the youngsters. I'll bet than 90% of the old fans are more irritated than pleased.

I anxiously await the My Little Dungeon bile demon virtual pet game; The Sims On Crack GTA ripoff; Theme Madden NFL stadium builder; and Bill Budge's AK-47 Construction Set.

Aleksander Adamkiewicz
profile image
Don't forget the Billy Mays Point and Click RPG. I'm really surprised nobody did that yet.

Bill Boggess
profile image
Ernest,

I couldn’t agree with you more. There’s a certain expectation and even pedigree associated with this franchise that EA has chosen to gloss over entirely.

The saddest thing about regulating this game to a FPS construct is that the current tech could have facilitated a brilliant open-world design with Blade Runner-type aesthetics and a copious heap of strategy thrown in for good measure. There is so much potential in this franchise and yet we are given another shooter.

The irony is that the only people to really want a new Syndicate game are the same people who will probably be disinterested in playing it as a FPS.

Bisse Mayrakoira
profile image
Cookie-cutter FPS is not interesting to seasoned gamers who have seen it all before (and probably done better), but I don't see a general mismatch between "old player" and "FPS". Especially with a single player game like Syndicate where you don't compete with the other players' twitch reflexes.

If the levels were open-ended with a heavy strategic and improvisation focus, there were destructible environments and car bombings, persuading/brainwashing masses of civilians, the player could jump between controlling different syndicate agents and give orders to the remaining agents, individual agents were considered disposable assets and there was no moralistic plot... the old fans would definitely acknowledge the game as a real Syndicate game, and most of them would tolerate or even appreciate the change of perspective.


none
 
Comment:
 




UBM Techweb
Game Network
Game Developers Conference | GDC Europe | GDC Online | GDC China | Gamasutra | Game Developer Magazine | Game Advertising Online
Game Career Guide | Independent Games Festival | Indie Royale | IndieGames

Other UBM TechWeb Networks
Business Technology | Business Technology Events | Telecommunications & Communications Providers

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Contact Us | Copyright © UBM TechWeb, All Rights Reserved.