Gamasutra: The Art & Business of Making Gamesspacer
View All     RSS
October 22, 2014
arrowPress Releases
October 22, 2014
PR Newswire
View All

If you enjoy reading this site, you might also want to check out these UBM Tech sites:

How to talk to the video game press in 2013 Exclusive
How to talk to the video game press in 2013
August 20, 2013 | By Mike Rose

I gave a talk at GDC Europe today titled "Getting Your Independent Games Noticed in 2013". The talk focused around getting the press to notice you and check out your game, and featured survey results, tips and tricks, and generally plenty of information about the dos and don'ts of flogging your game wares.

What you'll find here is a written version of the talk, complete with slides and survey statistics. If you attended the talk in Cologne, thanks very much for coming, and I hope it was worth 25 minutes of your time!

I'm going to start by analysing how you prepare to get noticed by the press even before you begin to real assault. It's just so much harder to get people to sing and dance about your game now than it was a few years ago. I remember back when I started writing for in 2009, we'd get around five emails a day and I'd say we wrote about most of the stuff we received. By 2011 I was getting 20-30 emails a day from devs, and now it's just crazy - there's so many studios who want to get their stuff out there.

SLIDE 2.jpgSo your number one priority when getting your game out there to the press is to stand out from the crowd. And there's so many ways you can do that, but I see developers on a daily basis just making silly errors -- things that on the surface don't appear to be that big of a deal, but when editors are getting dozens of emails a day, all it takes is one silly error for them to hit the delete button on your email, ignore your tweet, and click away from your website. You have to give them a reason to feel like they have to keep checking you and your game out.

So before I go on, I didn't want to stand in front of you and tell you a bunch of stuff that I think is right, only for it to turn out that my take on getting noticed isn't actually the same as anyone else's, and I end up just giving you loads of rubbish information.

With this in mind, I put together a survey several weeks ago, and I asked games journalists to fill it in.

SLIDE 3.jpgClick to enlarge

We're talking journalists at small games sites, massive sites, mobile games, PC gaming sites, part timers, full timers, the works. I got 116 responses in the end, split very evenly between small sites, medium sites, and big sites. And I'm going to fire information your way, and use the survey as proof that I'm not talking rubbish.

Before you do anything, there are two significant basics that you need to have down:

SLIDE 5.jpg

1. You need a hook

The slide essentially speaks for itself here, so I won't go into too much details. Suffice it to say, you need an angle about either yourself or your game that sets you apart from everyone else, and can the basis for news, rather than just "I have a new game coming out."

SLIDE 6.jpgThe examples you can see here range from fairly simple hooks -- made in QBasic, developer is an architect -- to more long and winding hooks that can really be molded into an interesting narrative that truly sets you and your game apart. Obviously not everyone has travelled around the world while making a game, or spent over 2000 hours on a job application, but it's not necessary to have such a large hook, just as long as you have something.

SLIDE 7.jpg

2. Build connections

Again, the slide mainly speaks for itself, but the bottom line is that you want to makes it impossible for the person you are contacting to ignore you, simply because they know in some capacity, and feel like it would be incredibly rude to skip your email, tweet or whatever else.

SLIDE 8.jpgOK, so these are examples of where this technique has helped a handful of developers to get noticed by myself. I talked to John Ribbins of Roll7 at Develop Conference last year, when he approached me to have a chat and show me his latest iOS game. Although no coverage came from that, I made a mental note to remember John, and over the course of the year, I saw him pop up in my Twitter feed every now and again.

Earlier this year, I saw a game called OlliOlli announced for PS Vita. I may not have clicked to check it out, but I spotted that Roll7 was the studio behind it, so I clicked through, and it looked ace. Then when I was at this year's Develop, Tom Hegarty of Roll7 tweeted me, asking if I wanted to play. I met up with him, tried the game, and it was amazing. I chatted with both Tom and John for ages, and afterwards wrote about the game. I'll no doubt be checking it out and talking about it at launch too.

So you see, simply by taking the time to chat with me last year, John's latest game is very much on my radar, and I've seen plenty of other places talking about it as well, as a result of having met the team and talked to them.

I used Imp Paired as an example of the hook earlier, and I'm using it again now, because developer Nicholas Lister has managed to get both points down very well. We talked via email after he asked me for some advice, and then he managed to pick me out of a crowd at Develop Conference, and shove his game at me. Again, it's another title that is on my radar because the developer made the effort to talk to me about himself, and find a hook that worked for him. That being said, he probably could have done with starting a lot sooner, as his game is now out, and I haven't seen a huge number of places covering it.

And JW from Vlambeer is an example of what happens when you both make great games and build connections over the course of a few years. By the time he and Rami Ismail put Vlambeer together in 2010, JW was already well-known for his zany style, both in his games and in his emails. By being an indie game scene figurehead before starting Vlambeer, JW helped to put the studio in a position where, from its very first game, its games were already being covered.

SLIDE 9.jpgTo wrap up what I've just been saying in a nice, neat turn of phrase, you're looking for your "hook" and your "line", which can then be used to land some coverage. If you do these two things successfully, then the chances of you getting reported on are so much higher. Do not estimate the hook, line and sinker.

OK, so you've done all this - how do you actually go about talking about your game? I want to first show you some bar charts and stats and other exciting shapes to give you an insight into the inboxs that you are looking to invade.

A lot of journalists say they get way too many emails each day - I know I personally do, I get dozens and dozens - so I wanted to see if this is the case across the board.

SLIDE 11.jpgClick to enlarge

This chart shows the number of emails that each person from my survey receives on a daily basis. Nearly 50 percent get less than 20 emails a day - that's really not that many, if we're honest. So clearly a lot of journalists do have time for your correspondence, and can reply back to you, and should be able to check out your game, right? So compare this chart to this one:

SLIDE 12.jpgClick to enlarge

This is how long the journalists who responded say they spend on each email on average. Nearly 40 percent said they read emails for less than 20 seconds each, and more than 75 percent spend less than a minute.

Imagine a journalist is reading through their emails with their finger hovering over the delete key, and they are quickly scanning each one, taking in what it has to offer, and killing it within the space of a few seconds - in a large number of cases, this is what is happening. You have to give them something that interests them in those brief seconds. They clearly have time to check your game out, as we saw - now just make them want to choose your game to fill that time.

So let's talk about the perfect email that is going to do just that - although you shouldn't think about this stuff as just email territory. This really covers everything - the way your treat your emails should be similar to the way you treat all your media correspondence. Just keep all of this in mind for everything you do when trying to get the word out.

SLIDE 14.jpgBe personal! I can't say this enough times - you aren't a massive company. Stop trying to act like one! Big companies have internal PR teams and marketing spiel because they are huge, and one person can't speak for a company with hundreds of people in it without passing information around for checking. Use your individuality and your personality.

Personalize every single email - and I mean every single one. I know it will take ages, and I know it will be the biggest chore in the world, but this is the success of your game and your studio we're talking about. The biggest turnoff is seeing an email drop into my inbox that is clearly a copy/paste job. But you know, if you've followed my rules from earlier, and made relationships with these people you're emailing, this shouldn't be so difficult. Obviously you can't talk to everyone, but still, the fact that you should already have talked to a lot of journalists in some form should make further correspondence a lot easier.

Use my name! If I see an email that starts with "Hi Gamasutra" or "Hi editors" or "Dear Sir" or just fires a press release straight out, it's so much easier for me to pass on it. Honestly, if an email to me starts with "Hi Mike, how's it going" and a reference to maybe something we talked about on Twitter, or something you've said to me before, or just generally being polite and nice, how the heck can I ignore you? I can't! I have to get back to you! You've got me cornered!

And that's the key right there - you can really up your chances of getting a response if you just talk to me like a real person, and a friendly person.

One caveat - faking it is dangerous. I've had emails where the person has started with my name, asked me how I am, so far so good - then said something like "I love Independently-Speaking, it's such a great read." That's my personal blog that I barely ever update, and there is no-one in the world who loves it, not even me. Don't fake it - be a genuine person, and that will come through

It's the same with tweets - I've seen tweets where someone has said to me "Hey, really love your stuff, hope you can check out my game!" and then I click on their Twitter feed, and they are spamming that same line to every journalist they can find. This does not work - in fact it does more harm than good.

Also, don't forget to use your hook as your narrative! Remember that hook we were talking about? Use it as the selling point of your game to journalists. We desperately want a story, and if you give us a good one, we'll lap it up.

To emphasise the hook point, I just want to show you part of the survey I did - I asked "What is more likely to make you pay attention to an email from a developer?", gave a bunch of options, and asked journalists to rank them in terms of importance.

SLIDE 15.jpgClick to enlarge

So what you see here is the results ranked in order of importance - the ranking takes all votes into consideration and tallies them up. And up top by a long shot is "An interesting developer story" - aka the hook. If there isn't an interesting angle, or backstory, or anything that fleshes out news about your game and makes it more than just "here is a new game that looks the same as other games", then I'm already not interested.

I know that sounds harsh, and your game could be quite similar to other games yet be completely fantastic, but I'm sorry that I'm most likely going to miss out on it. Somebody writing about your game needs something to make the post special, and "Indie game X is coming out" often doesn't cut it.

Looking at the other top picks:

"A Steam code" and "A link to download the game for free" -- just give your game away. Don't ask if someone wants a code, or hide them away. Developers who already have notable releases and success can do that, because every scrounger wants one, and it makes sense to perhaps hold them back and consider your plan of attack. But when you're starting out and trying to get discovered, just get the game out there. Just throw it at people.

Think about it this way - if you give a copy of your game to someone, and they write about it, and just one person buys it based on that article, then it made sense to do so - most likely, that person asking for a copy wasn't going to buy the game anyway.

"A link to a YouTube video" - Trailers are so important, but here's the thing - your video needs to be fantastic. "Good" or "great" won't cut it - your video needs to be the sort of production that could go viral. If you aren't any good at making videos, consider asking for help from someone else. There's so many talented people out there who would be able to make your game look amazing in a video. Sure, it'll cost you, but it will (fingers crossed) end up being worth it for so many reasons. The press will post about it because it's so simple to make a quick news post about a video. People will post the link on social media. It'll get spread on forums. You need a great video game trailer, and if you can't do it yourself, get someone else too.

If you are going to do it yourself, look at all the indie game trailers that have the most hits. What do they do right? Great fitting music, a good length (no longer than 90 seconds usually), actual action from the game, not menus or text or anything like that. Show the game, not logos and all that rubbish!

SLIDE 16.jpgI also asked journalists to give specific things that they look for in a good email or correspondence. Some notable responses can be found in the above slide, and these do a good job of emphasize some of the elements I've already mentioned.

Here's one of those word cloud things that everyone loves so much - I threw all of the journalist responses in, and ended up with this:

SLIDE 17.jpgClick to enlarge

Here's some of the larger words picked out:

"Just" - people mainly saying "just get on with it." Don't mess around, and just get to the point!

"name" - this is what I was saying about being personal. Use names, because if you don't, you've already lost.

"Press release" - this is actually people saying that they'd rather have a personal email than a press release. Every mention of "press release" is saying this.

"website" and "video" - this is people just saying what they feel is definitely required in an email from a developer. In this case, links to both a website for the game, and a video on YouTube.

SLIDE 18.jpgClick to enlarge

Now let's look at what you should be avoiding. It's not just OK to personalize your emails - you also need to get to the point. We saw before that the vast majority of press don't spend much time reading each email, so you need to get in there fast, deal out the information, and get out.

Say hi, and then in the same breath explain what your game is, and what your hook is. By the end of the first paragraph I should already know why I want to read the rest, because otherwise I'm not going to read the rest.

Looking at the survey, you can see way out in front is "Big walls of text, not to the point quick enough", which is the point I was just making. There's no mathematical formula for how long your email should be, but if I had to say a length, I'd say three/four paragraphs should be your max. You can also add more later when the person emails you back - they might say "Oh, that backstory to the game's development sounds really interesting, can you give me more information on that?" and that's when you hit them with the long version of the story. If someone has asked for information from you, that's when you can go longhand, because you know they want to read it.

Most of the rest of these are then focused on the personalized angle we've been talking about. "Impersonal text", "Wrong name" "Obvious copy and paste job".

You'll notice down the bottom that the one that people cared least about was "You don't know the person or the company" - in other words, even if you're an unknown, it's still possible to get through. I was saying earlier that building relationships is important, but of course, it's impossible to know absolutely everyone, and you're going to have to talk to lots of people you've never talked to before. So this just shows that even if you don't know someone, you shouldn't just expect that they're not going to get back to you - you can still break through if you stay personal, and have a great game.

SLIDE 19.jpgOther responses from journalists regarding bad moves to make can be found in the above slide, and it's all well worth making a note of, and avoiding.

SLIDE 20.jpgClick to enlarge

And here's a word cloud for the bad stuff. There's some obvious ones here:

"subject line" - this one is massive and was brought up multiple times, with journalists saying that subject lines are often too long, all in block capitals, or are just simply filled with random words that don't seem to convey the email's message. Your safest option is to just put your game's name in the subject line, or perhaps fit your hook in there too if it doesn't make the subject line too long.

"Kickstarter" - this goes for Greenlight as well. When you're running a Kickstarter campaign, you want to sell the person reading on your game, and then mention the Kickstarter in passing. Your email should not be focused around the Kickstarter, except perhaps if you're a bit more well known. If the person likes the look of your game, they will then also mention the Kickstarter too - but starting an email with the fact that you are running a Kickstarter campaign is a massive turnoff.

"relevant" - As mentioned in the above quotes, you need to make sure you are emailing relevant information to the right people. RockPaperShotgun doesn't want to know about your iOS game. TouchArcade doesn't care about your new PC download. All that will happen is that you could do more harm than good, because these people might remember you as being the devs who didn't know what they were doing.

"interest" "attention" - more focus on the hook again, as journalists just want you to get to the point and say something interesting.

"mobile" - this is a combination of people saying they don't cover mobile games, and they don't care about mobile games. Again, make sure you have the right audience, especially for mobile games - a lot of websites still choose not to cover mobile, even though it's such a massive market now.

When it comes to providing assets in your email, there's a few different possible ways to do it. I personally like when I can access everything - screenshots, details, videos etc - as easily as possible. Here's what my survey showed:

SLIDE 21.jpgClick to enlarge

I don't know if you're aware of presskit(), but it's essentially a web template for presenting all of the information about your game and your studio, created by Rami from Vlambeer. Both that and offering a Dropbox link were by far the top choices, so I would highly suggest that you offer both types, and just link them. That's not to say that you shouldn't offer the others too - obviously you should be putting all your assets on your own website - but in terms of accessibility, it's so much easier if I can just grab them all from a familiar website.

Before I finish, I just wanted to throw some random points your way, and also provide some other points of reference on the topic. You can find the additional points in the following slide:

SLIDE 22.jpgThe first two are self-explanatory, but I just wanted to go into a bit more details about the other two, as they are hugely important.

First off, it is never, ever a good idea to respond in a negative way to critical feedback. If a review, or a preview, or a news piece, or any sort of post about your game is negative, it's extremely tempting to go in all guns blazing, and pick the piece apart in the comments, or on Twitter. Sometimes this works, and you can rally other devs and journalists to your cause - fair play to you if you can manage this. The majority of the time, however, you'll just come across as a bit of an idiot, and you'll also lose any chance of being covered by that website again.

Here's the best way to deal with negative feedback: Disarm the writer with politeness. If you leave a comment saying something along the lines of "I'm sorry to hear that you didn't enjoy our game, I hope that won't put you off our future games!", and other comments along that angle, you suddenly become the good guy, and the nasty review looks hideous in comparison. It's possible that the writer will then remember your studio, and choose to write about you again based on the fact that they have gained a little respect for you.

Compare this to the situation in which you mouth off in the comments about how the writer's opinion is wrong, and tons of people in the App Store are giving your game five stars. Anyone reading the review will then see your nasty comment, see the bad score, and quickly come to the conclusion that neither your game nor your studio are worth bothering with.

Regarding the hiring of PR companies - this one is an interesting topic, because I see plenty of indie devs on Twitter saying "don't waste your money on a PR firm, you're an indie so you can be personal and have the upperhand!" - yet I still get tons of emails every day that are just completely awful, and the dev clearly needs some help with the marketing side of things.

Consider whether you do need help with that side of things - but also research heavily the companies that provide these services, because some of them are just utterly pointless and are a huge turnoff. Others are great though, and are really helpful to work with - I'm not going to name any specifically, but just ask other indies which are good, and you'll find the best ones quickly.

SLIDE 23.jpgClick to enlarge

Out of interest, I asked my survey "If a PR company gets in touch with you about an indie game, and you're interested in the game, what is usually your next move?"

I mainly asked this because I wondered whether people even really get back to PRs, or just go around them and go straight to the developer. You can see here that around 70 percent of the time, the PR is coming through and doing the job. Other comments that people left me: Some said that devs get back faster than PRs, or that they will also email the dev as well because then they're hitting all points of contact in one go. So keep all this in mind when you're considering going with a PR firm.

There's still more I could talk about, but for now I'd suggest checking out other writing on the topic, including:

Five PR tips indies really need - Leigh Alexander
The Big List of Indie Game Marketing - Pixel Prospector
An Indie Game Developer’s Marketing Checklist - Robert DellaFave
The indie marketing plan - Joost van Dongen

Related Jobs

Infinity Ward / Activision
Infinity Ward / Activision — Woodland Hills, California, United States

Senior Game Designer - Infinity Ward
Infinity Ward / Activision
Infinity Ward / Activision — Woodland Hills, California, United States

Gameplay Animation Engineer - Infinity Ward
Infinity Ward / Activision
Infinity Ward / Activision — Woodland Hills, California, United States

Producer - Infinity Ward
Infinity Ward / Activision
Infinity Ward / Activision — Woodland Hills, California, United States

Lead Tools Engineer - Infinity Ward


Ben Serviss
profile image
Awesome Mike, this is probably one of the most useful articles for indies on the site.

"We desperately want a story, and if you give us a good one, we'll lap it up."

There is *always* a demand for good content - you have to know your audience before you can connect with them, and good stories are always what the journalist audience wants!

Rudy Gjurkovic
profile image
Very informative Mike! You provided a lot of useful information for people. I have been trying my best to tailor our PR for our game Blaster X HD in order to get it noticed as well. I do have one question for you though, in regards to the "get personal" area of your article.

I personally have generated a very large list of contacts for review sites, and being "new" to the scene and virtually an unkown, I don't think that some of us Indie Developers choose not to be personal in our messages, as a lot also depends on the structure of the company you are contacting. I have noticed a lot of review sites usually have a general email contact "" with multiple people who review games. Some of the sites you really have no idea who the contact is as it is never stated in their about team section. My quesiton would be, do you have any advice on how to approach and personalize your email for a company that you really have no personal contact with? I read where you said in your article that a great game with a well tailored message might get looked at, but we are finding even a simple reply back from anyone is extremely difficult if you are an unknown.

Thanks for the Advice - Rudy

Sjors Jansen
profile image
Hi Mike,
do you want us to suck your cock while you're at it?

It's not meant as an insult. I read up on indie games since Tim W's old blog, so I seriously appreciate your work on indiegames.

So, what I mean to say is: it comes off as backdoor politics to me. Does the press not feel a sense of that at all? Or am I just too old and blind?
At least you probably saw the complacency of the press reflected in your words when you wrote this presentation right?

But do I really understand it correctly that most of the games journalists cannot bother to take 30 minutes each day to read 30 emails? That's astounding. Any reasons for why? Were they all unpaid journalists or something?

I know most do not share my perspective but I'll gladly take a bullet for the few who do. And I'm not so much actively judging you and the games press, more trying to figure out if there's a better solution. And at least showing not everybody feels this is a great way to go.

I posted something about that a while back as well:

Michael Joseph
profile image
Thanks for this reply Sjors.

I still think it's possible for genuinely good games and applications to sell themselves (i.e. no active marketing on the part of the authors).

But when we're conditioned to believe that marketing is as important (or more important!) than making great products, it distorts and diminishes the creative process by which we make games. This is very much at the heart of the big budget AAA development process that many indies in recent years have been railing against.

And much of game journalism is still caught up in that tit for tat mentality of being partners with the producers that have courted them in being gatekeepers of the word.

Ferruccio Cinquemani
profile image
Sjors, that's the best first line of a comment ever :D
I agree with you. It's a little bit strange that the relationship between press and creators is like this. The press should be the one *looking* for stories. And sometimes stories need to be found. Sometime the unassuming little game made by people who can't self promote so well can be extremely interesting.

And I salso feel there is something really annoying about the whole concept "become friends with journalists so they will cover your game". I'd rather not carefully send tweets to a journalist three months before realease in the hope he will remember my name. It's disingenous and morally questionable.

Even the "find a story hook" is problematic. Well, my indie studio is made by two guys with kids and day jobs. We work at night and weekends and we try to make good games. Unfortunately, there is no story there. No one copied our game (we kind of wish; that would be a fantastic hook), our lives are really not that special and we generally don't have the time to go to conferences and game jams... we just try to make good games.

I understand the point of Mike's article (I've been a game journalist for ten years), but it feels to me like indie games are becoming more and more about a small number of personalities with good connections rather than... you know... the games themselves.

Sjors Jansen
profile image
Thanks guys, it's appreciated.

I was kind of hoping Mike or Leigh would respond to shed some light on their circumstances as journalists. I expect they are overburdened. But it seems interacting with your audience on a public website is not a priority, in odd contrast to what is expected of indie developers.

But, to be fair, it's probably conference time where they are talking to developers and also, the few times I wrote a personal email to journalists I got back a reply. So that's not what I'm complaining about.

I think the info in the article is useful and developers make plenty of boneheaded mistakes (like me).
I'm also not saying developers should not at least email some journalists about their game. But I would like to see an environment where that is enough to at least be mentioned.

For instance something like imdb or indiedb, where there would be a steady stream of all the new games, but also the journalists can single out their favorites on their personalised parts of such a hypothetical site. That would basically be an edited version, their perspective, of that full stream page.
Like in videogame magazines you always got a small profile of each journalist and what their favorites games were, their specialties and preferences more or less. That way readers can either relate to their taste or not and know what they're in for. It provides a context to their opinion of a game.
(I still remember Paul Davies likes Kirby and Gary Harrod likes fighting games for instance. So I know that if Gary is going to review sim city, he might find things more tedious then I would find them for instance.)
And it doesn't have to be an over-the-top egotrip like certain dutch game journalists. But journalists are always telling developers they want the personal story, well guess what, the same thing goes for them.

(And not discussing your own articles on gamasutra is a big no no imho. But maybe I just need to use bigger insults, point out their typo's perhaps. ;)

But yeah, if you leave out all context and imagine what journalists look like from this article, you'd end up with that guy pearl from the blade movie, at least spiritually.
Is that who we want to feed our years of precious work, our babies to? :)

@Ferruccio Cinquemani: I think your story might be that you're a game journalist turned indie :) Maybe if you were to mention why, the other journalists could instantly relate (I know at least Leigh and Brandon did some work on videogames).

Shay Pierce
profile image
You didn't get any replies from the author because your comment was a flame.

Unfortunately, two people made the mistake of dignifying your flame with a civil response, and now your reply makes it clear that you've missed the lesson. Which is:

Don't flame. You look like a troll, because that's what you are.

I can't believe I'm having to explain the obvious irony here, but I will. You can't complain about journalists filtering you out, in a post where you have just bluntly insulted a journalist. It's their JOB to filter you out, in favor of people who know how to communicate like civilized beings, and who might have something constructive to say.

You're also accusing journalists of being entitled because they don't read every email and comment they get; yet you're being incredibly entitled - do you think you have a right to have articles written about you? A journalist isn't your unpaid advertising intern. They're a person with a job; and if you want to get the free exposure they can provide, you need to understand how their job works, so you can try to meet them halfway. That's all this article is trying to say.

Sjors Jansen
profile image
Hi Shay,

I'm sorry it comes off as that negative to you.
I wrote the first sentence because it is an absurd thought in line with the article. It makes fun of the article and the obvious responses, yes that can be harmful I admit.
Which is why I wrote the second sentence in conjunction, to point out that it was going to provide a completely opposite and hopefully reasonable argument. I did not write it to solely insult.

Also, do not forget that Leigh's article started with an insult as well.
And that neither Leigh or Mike have responded to ANY comment made at their respective articles. Although that is what is expected of those they criticize or lecture. I find that ironic.

If you feel there is nothing constructive in what I wrote, I'm sorry. There are people who do. And if what you think is the truth than I will have shot myself in the foot, right? The only people who would benefit are those that don't dare to speak out on an opposing view to the press, because that might get them ignored in the future.

I hope if you read my words again that you'll find that I'm asking for clarification as well. I am trying to understand their reasons for why their email time is so limited (as are plenty of others here) because the why of their situation is not explained.
And yes, I do feel games are entitled to coverage by the games press. Without games there probably wouldn't be a games press. The other way around doesn't quite hold up. As far as to wether they should cover my games or not, I never asked them so.. I'm probably to insecure to feel entitled for myself.

Hugo Cardoso
profile image
It does seem like there are 2 sets of rules, according to this article no AAA game would ever get coverage.
Does every yearly Call of Duty have a hook? Does it have a personal story? Are the emails personalized to every single journalist? The answer is no but every site covers it.

In the relationship AAA - Press, AAA has the power and the Press depend on them for content.
In the relationship Indie - Press, Press has the power and the Indies depend on them for visibility.
The article reads like all the things the Press would like to get from every AAA but since they don't have any power in that relationship they try to get it from the ones they do have power over.

I guess what I'm saying is I prefer spending my time making the best games I can and letting them speak for themselves rather than spending months chatting up dozens of journalists on Twitter, commenting on their articles, spending money on conventions and wasting days personalizing 100 emails trying to beg for coverage.

John Owens
profile image
:-) Good post Shay.

Although I have to admit Sjors' first line made laugh too.

@Sjors - Do you seriously think games are entitled to press coverage. If some toddler did a doodle on a fridge, do you also think that has a right to be included in consideration for the Turner prize?

Journalist's' have a job to write about what they think their audience would be interested in and that might be a new good game or simply a story about a game developer. As Shay said they aren't there to advertise our games for free.

Sjors Jansen
profile image
@John Owens
No. I did not say that, I stated the opposite in fact: "As far as to wether they should cover my games or not, I never asked them so.. I'm probably to insecure to feel entitled for myself.". Including typo.
But it's nice to know you can at least laugh about how I presented my point. It was meant that way.

So I can only try to be more clear in that..
My point is that there seems to be a huge difference between the investment developers make and the investment journalists make. You read that I and a couple of other people asked for clarification on their time spent right?

I bear no grudge or something, but I do worry about the direction this is going in. I feel there needs to be a discussion but that's probably hard on a website run by journalists? :)

We used to have Tim W's coverage for instance who did all this amazing research into indiegames for years and years. is basically his legacy, even though he quit a while back. is still there and I know of some people who really care about the games themselves, like RockLeeSmile on youtube.
But I'm a little afraid that some game journalists like to focus on the stuff around the game, instead of the stuff in the game. That what they actually want to cover is people. I can understand that if they aren't really happy about the state of games in general, or with their career or something. (not meant as a troll remark, I've sort of been there and I agree games are holding back in general).
And it's all good stuff of course. At least mostly.

The creator and the creation are related of course. But that doesn't mean it is relevant to others. The connection between the creation and others is completely seperate. (Unless a creator is actively pursuing a personal connection to the audience) In a lot of more traditional art, the creator realizes this and sometimes even tries very hard to get out of the way. So focusing on everything but the game, the personal story etc. can also lead to tabloid-ism. Especially if journalists have teh internets legion as target audience.
And if you start throwing in that creators better be nice to journalists or else.., then objectively looking at games is pretty much out the window.
You want to make a game for that environment?

It's not about the personal sob story, it's not about some hollow hook. It's the game.
We are talking about Game journalists right?

I'm not here to talk journalists down and tell them what to do, I hope you've noticed that I think very highly of some.
But you know, it's mostly egoism on all sides. "For your game a thousand others." or "As long as my game gets covered I don't care"
Which is also why there is no real discussion about the environment that's forming in my opinion.
Even though there seems to be plenty of frustration, from developers and journalists both.

I hope you get my point.

Curtiss Murphy
profile image
Nicely done presentation of simple, practical tips. Look forward to bumping into you one day at a future GDC.

Thomas Happ
profile image
Thanks, Mike. This is definitely joining all the other articles in my giant "Axiom Verge Marketing" google doc!

R. Hunter Gough
profile image
I'm confused about the "how to supply assets" slide.

Can you please clarify why "a page on the game's website (formatted using presskit)" is at the top of the list, but "a page on the game's website (not formatted using presskit)" is near the bottom of the list? I would imagine that there are plenty of well-formatted press pages out there that don't use presskit, and I'd likewise imagine that one could totally bungle a presskit page.

Gavin Koh
profile image
This article makes for an interesting read... but I thought I'd voice out the dark side of Video Games Press. The "minority" who give Video Games Press a bad name.

I was actually approached by a review website asking if I would like my game (on Google Play Store) to be reviewed. I said ok, and so I sent a "press release kit" email back. Their reply was quite surprising. At the end was this - "We are one of the most influential websites that provide an app video review service, and we have created video reviews for thousands of developers. Most of them chose the Standard Package, only costs $1xx (yes, it's a 3 digit figure), which contains video and text review."

That was a shocking moment for me? I was in utter disgust... I would never ever do that, and that website has been black-listed by me.

Is this the trend of Game Press nowadays? Must we pay to feature our game? Just to get that few seconds of fame? And who in their right mind have been paying them to foment such a practice?

I think we should have a sister article that reads, "How to avoid unethical Video Games Press services in 2013"

Rudy Gjurkovic
profile image
This practice happens far too often. Same thing happened with our game, whether you approach them, or they approach you, there are a lot of review sites that offer reviews for payment only, unless you are a big-time is very unfortunate, and I as well never partake in these services.

Noirin Curran
profile image
That's so crazy! I mean, how could you expect somebody to write a fair and unbiased review if you were paying them to write it? Sounds like awful practice...

Jose Gallardo
profile image
(Sorry if my english not perfect, it is not my native language)

I found the same many times, every week i get 2-3 mails from these sites. There are a lot of companies making business with us (i mean, Indie)... they sell reviews, video reviews, user adquisition, support for crowdfunding campaings, etc... The business it is not make games, it is to scam game developers.

But not only this kind of companies are on this way. Some big game news sites too. I sent my press release to one of these, i have not response for weeks. One day one person from advertising department on this game news site wrote me asking if i want to promote my games on their site... You can imagine the price, 4 digits... And the package include a front page article about my game!!!

They move only by the greed. And when this day they have not a "money source", then pay attention to some PR from Indie an publish to fill the day. It is like a lotto.

Darren Shield
profile image
Good effort with the research. After thinking about it, I'm not sure you should rely on the accuracy of the data. So a lot of respondents say they spend very little time reading an email - in the context of the survey that's just driving home the point that journalists want the gist of the story quickly so they can decide whether to pursue it. Are people just saying they spend 20 seconds on an email? I'd hope journalists spend a little more than a minute reading an email. Good content, finding that interesting new game, is too important to ignore an email.

Ryan Leonski
profile image
Great tips!

I think the major thing for me is figuring out what works and not making those small mistakes that could disinterest the reader. Keeping them interested in what I'm doing is what I'm doing is something that I am working hard on.

Stephen Richards
profile image
Really good article - highly useful!

Jeff Ibacache
profile image
Good article!, thanks for sharing this :)!

Big BuBu
profile image
Kind of a weird job, the job of a journalist that doesn't have time to read emails.
They do probably have time to read emails from publishers that pay advertising :P

Jose Gallardo
profile image
Yes, that's the key!!

Jim Fisher
profile image
Excellent article. Thanks for the insights!